|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-03-2017, 02:21 PM | #1 |
Banned
59
Rep 115
Posts |
Thoughts on why E46 M3 had an SMG but the E39 M5 did not?
So arguably an M5 is more a cruiser than a sporty M3 and an SMG is more a cruiser transmission than a enthusiast manual transmission.
So why did the cruiser get the enthusiast transmission option only and the more likely to be a track car got both options? Now I know the E39 M5 was made from 1998-2003 and the E46 M3 was made from 2000-2006. They kind of stair step each other. I assume the sole reason was the E46 M3 was a newer car so it got the new SMG transmission while BMW did not waste time to put the new transmission in a car near the end of its run (E39 M5), but I wanted to hear your thoughts? |
03-03-2017, 02:22 PM | #2 |
First Lieutenant
134
Rep 356
Posts |
Don't forget the E46 had the SMGII.
SMG originally came to the fore in the E36 M3... |
Appreciate
2
Captain Apex58.50 feuer4285.00 |
03-03-2017, 02:23 PM | #3 |
Banned
59
Rep 115
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-03-2017, 06:26 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
455
Rep 589
Posts Drives: 2019 X5, 2022 i4 M50 Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sunshine State
|
yup!
__________________
Current: ‘19 G05 X5, '22 G26 i4 M50
Retired: F15 X5, F80 M3 ZCP, F10 535d, E84 X1, E90 335d, E92 335i, E46 330i, E39 M5 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-03-2017, 06:44 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
865
Rep 3,274
Posts |
I had a 2006 E46 M3 with SMG and I thought it was fun at the time. But I missed my manual and now I will simply never buy a non manual transmission car ever again. I just miss it too much. I live in LA too! Pump that clutch pedal baby!
__________________
|
03-06-2017, 01:59 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
165
Rep 455
Posts |
Two reasons:
1. The aforementioned two-year gap (think how fast we went from clunky single clutches to awesome dual clutch boxes). I remember reading that SMG simply wasn't ready. 2. I think BMW was not trying to invest a huge amt of money into the E39 M5, which makes it all the more amazing they did such a great job. They had thought the 540i would be enough (this is the true story on record) but when AMG came out with the first E55, BMW unexpectedly had to step it up, and so the E39 M5 was a bit rushed, cutting corners in places. Evidence: Extensively modifying the 540i engine but using the same headers (very restrictive) and same size clutch (definite weak point). They weren't about to sink a ton of money into developing an SMG for the M5 - especially considering it would never sell in the volume of the M3.
__________________
2011.5 E90 M3
White/Red, 6MT, ZCP, slicktop Past: '02 S2000, '01 M5, '98 Integra w/many mods |
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 04:00 AM | #12 | |
Plenipotentiary
2614
Rep 3,046
Posts |
Quote:
This is attached to an S62... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 09:41 AM | #13 |
Banned
555
Rep 2,825
Posts |
how do you know this SMG was not modified? because i can guarantee you that an SMG built to work with 260 ft/lb of torque cant just be swapped into the e39 m5 making 270 ft/lb just like that without modifying the transmission.
why else do you think BMW did not include the SMG for the e39 m5? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 09:48 AM | #14 |
salty cowboys fan
6869
Rep 3,633
Posts |
Who knows, just be thankful
E39 prices have been climbing, good ones were ~$30-35k last time I was looking. I've seen 6MT E60's for less! |
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 01:07 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
3899
Rep 1,983
Posts |
Quote:
I can't speak for reliability with the increased power/torque because mine was stock and had minor issues. I do know that I changed the clutch (as preventative maintenance) at 105K miles and the old clutch was still at a solid 75%. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 02:14 PM | #17 | |
Plenipotentiary
2614
Rep 3,046
Posts |
Quote:
There was almost no consumer desire for SMG on the E39 M5 nor the vehicle I posted earlier... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 02:53 PM | #18 | |
Banned
555
Rep 2,825
Posts |
Quote:
I wonder why the SMG was somewhat popular in the e46 then. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 03:10 PM | #19 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
3899
Rep 1,983
Posts |
Quote:
Even still, the DCT in the F10/12/13/06 Ms can only handle about 650-700 WTQ before the clutches start slipping...ONLY. LOL. DPs and a Stage 2 tune will get you there easily. But I digress... I really like the SMG in the M3 because it was lightning fast (not as fast as the DCT) but more importantly, because in the fastest setting it would make a very distinct mechanical sound, it was just satisfying to drive. However, it was shit around town, especially in low speeds, and it was impossible to launch effectively off the line...either massive wheel spin or bog. I'd side with the people that say that this transmission is definitely more suited for the track. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 06:41 PM | #20 | |
Banned
555
Rep 2,825
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2017, 06:54 PM | #21 | |
Captain
253
Rep 775
Posts |
Quote:
They probably didn't do it because they figured there wasn't a market for it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2017, 07:45 AM | #22 |
Emperor
1614
Rep 2,764
Posts |
According to BMW's marketing material at the time, "because it's a drivers car, the M5 is available exclusively in SMG". How far things have changed :P
I'd say the real reason is because it's not at all in keeping with the character of the car. The e39 M5 is relaxed, comfortable, easy fast. It also doesn't need to be shifted quickly to get the most out of it because it has power at all RPM. The SMG is not relaxed/comfortable/easy fast-- you have to work to make it smooth. Its benefit is that it makes it easier to keep it in the powerband on track-- the M5 isn't great on track and the powerband is everywhere. I see no technical limitations on it-- same transmission as the e46 M3 (SMG trans and 6mt trans were the same trans-- just with a human or a hydraulic robot operating it), same ecu as the e46 M3 (talks to the smg ecu).
__________________
2005 M3 Coupe, 2004 M3 Wagon, 2001 M5 Sedan, 2008 M5 6MT Sedan, 2012 128i M sport |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|