proTUNING Freaks
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-29-2014, 12:52 PM   #1
dreamsongs
First Lieutenant
United_States
142
Rep
356
Posts

Drives: E46 M3 - E92 M3 - 335i vert
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Front wheel gap - Why ???

I finally figured out what it was that was bothering me about that part of the car.....why is there so much space in the front wheel gap ?

It seems more noticeable in the M3 than the M4. Not that it can't be corrected but it's a mod that could've been avoided. My eyes keep wanting to go there now when I look at the M3, I don't know, I have a hard time not noticing it now...
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2014, 10:19 PM   #2
gago1101
Private
gago1101's Avatar
United_States
11
Rep
98
Posts

Drives: '18 911 GT3
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamsongs View Post
I finally figured out what it was that was bothering me about that part of the car.....why is there so much space in the front wheel gap ?
Part of the reason is that the front wheel/tire diameter is smaller than the back one. You can always go to 265/35ZR19 instead of the 255s to narrow the gap.

Personally, I will be changing my tires to 265/35ZR19 front and 295/30ZR19 rear.
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2014, 10:23 PM   #3
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
2119
Rep
8,919
Posts

Drives: 2023 M2 Coupe, 2020 GLE 450
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamsongs View Post
I finally figured out what it was that was bothering me about that part of the car.....why is there so much space in the front wheel gap ?

It seems more noticeable in the M3 than the M4. Not that it can't be corrected but it's a mod that could've been avoided. My eyes keep wanting to go there now when I look at the M3, I don't know, I have a hard time not noticing it now...
Tire diameter difference is minor F/R. Main thing is OEM allows for front wheels turning with chains mounted while suspension is compressed on bumps, and are obviously conservative regarding clearance.
__________________

Greg Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA
2023 M2 Coupe - Brooklyn Grey/Cognac/CF, 6MT; 2020 MB GLE 450
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2014, 10:37 PM   #4
19x
Banned
19x's Avatar
United_States
460
Rep
471
Posts

Drives: 2021 M2C
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

iTrader: (1)

^^^ That doesn't change the fact that every M3 since the e46 had a horrendous front wheel gap. They all looked like 4x4's from the factory. And they didn't have to.

For example, AMG C class always had (at least visually) a much lower stance.

The wheel gaps on the M3 are killing me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one to go for the slammed look. Far from it. It's just that this day in age nearly all competitors look much lower than M3's.

I realize this can be "corrected" with an aftermarket suspension or springs alone, but it'd be nice for once to rock the stock suspension at a height that doesn't make the car look like a 4x4.

Both Audi and Merc did it. Why can't BMW?

I certainly hope the competition package lowers this car by at least a half inch.
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2014, 12:49 PM   #5
dreamsongs
First Lieutenant
United_States
142
Rep
356
Posts

Drives: E46 M3 - E92 M3 - 335i vert
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by camber View Post
^^^ That doesn't change the fact that every M3 since the e46 had a horrendous front wheel gap. They all looked like 4x4's from the factory. And they didn't have to.

For example, AMG C class always had (at least visually) a much lower stance.

The wheel gaps on the M3 are killing me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one to go for the slammed look. Far from it. It's just that this day in age nearly all competitors look much lower than M3's.

I realize this can be "corrected" with an aftermarket suspension or springs alone, but it'd be nice for once to rock the stock suspension at a height that doesn't make the car look like a 4x4.

Both Audi and Merc did it. Why can't BMW?

I certainly hope the competition package lowers this car by at least a half inch.
Well said, there's more space than it has to be. Even my 335 vert doesn't look that way. Not sure what's up with that...
Appreciate 0
      05-03-2014, 01:04 PM   #6
Tonymiabmw
Colonel
Tonymiabmw's Avatar
552
Rep
2,633
Posts

Drives: Nardo F90 M5 on order
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: In Transit

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by camber
^^^ That doesn't change the fact that every M3 since the e46 had a horrendous front wheel gap. They all looked like 4x4's from the factory. And they didn't have to.

For example, AMG C class always had (at least visually) a much lower stance.

The wheel gaps on the M3 are killing me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one to go for the slammed look. Far from it. It's just that this day in age nearly all competitors look much lower than M3's.

I realize this can be "corrected" with an aftermarket suspension or springs alone, but it'd be nice for once to rock the stock suspension at a height that doesn't make the car look like a 4x4.

Both Audi and Merc did it. Why can't BMW?

I certainly hope the competition package lowers this car by at least a half inch.
Springs are cheap
Appreciate 0
      05-03-2014, 10:37 PM   #7
Swancoat
Lieutenant
136
Rep
504
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gago1101 View Post
Part of the reason is that the front wheel/tire diameter is smaller than the back one. You can always go to 265/35ZR19 instead of the 255s to narrow the gap.

Personally, I will be changing my tires to 265/35ZR19 front and 295/30ZR19 rear.
I don't think you know the difference between a tire's diameter and a tire's width.
Appreciate 0
      05-06-2014, 08:22 PM   #8
tooch
Captain
United_States
112
Rep
806
Posts

Drives: F82
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NOR-CAL

iTrader: (0)

Typical BMW 3 finger gap. That will have to be addressed soon after i take delivery.
__________________

96 E31 JB
07 E92 AW
F82 BSM
Appreciate 0
      05-26-2014, 06:29 PM   #9
ƒ°
ƒ°'s Avatar
101
Rep
1,237
Posts

Drives: ✚
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: ✚ ✚

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swancoat
Quote:
Originally Posted by gago1101 View Post
Part of the reason is that the front wheel/tire diameter is smaller than the back one. You can always go to 265/35ZR19 instead of the 255s to narrow the gap.

Personally, I will be changing my tires to 265/35ZR19 front and 295/30ZR19 rear.
I don't think you know the difference between a tire's diameter and a tire's width.
In fact, the tires width directly affects the height of the sidewall. So a 265/35 will have a taller sidewall than a 255/35.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST