procede dic 3-30 dyno fbo plus meth

litz4244 · 04-13-2011, 09:24 PM

vehicle is a 2007 335 automatic
Mods are
Ets fmic 5inch
plm downpipes
stock catback
procede v5 with dic 3-30 maps
procede meth kit mixed 75/25 meth water with cm10 nozzle
Hardpipe with tial bov
Boost settings start boost 17psi max 18.5 with 10 percent ic

Sniz · 04-13-2011, 09:35 PM

afr's look good and safe. Most will expect more HP on a dynojet but who knows without a baseline.

litz4244 · 04-13-2011, 09:40 PM

Yeah i was honeslty expecting a little bit more too but i was told the stock catback is restrictive.

cn555ic · 04-13-2011, 09:41 PM

Did you log the run with the Procede Reader?

litz4244 · 04-13-2011, 09:49 PM

no i wasnt there my buddy took the car for me today. i kinda wish i did log it to see what was going on.

Brey335i · 04-13-2011, 10:08 PM

I was expecting closer to 420 whp... too bad you don't have a baseline

litz4244 · 04-13-2011, 10:25 PM

Yeah I was expecting that too. Yeah I have no baseline unfortantly. The only thing I cansay is the car went 13.5 at 103 stock. I want to put a cat back on and do some logs and go back and try again.

themyst · 04-13-2011, 11:01 PM

Without baseline it's hard to give any meaningful comments. Just an FYI, I did 413whp with 295 baseline on the old v4 maps on a 135i with same mods at 17.5 psi. I believe the stock exhaust is even more restrictive than the 335i. I did 424whp at 18.5psi. 93 octane + meth.

cstmx_ryder · 04-13-2011, 11:14 PM

Ya, I'd say that the trend has been ~420/420 on average. But like others have said, without a baseline, it's just another dyno run......

dadgar · 04-13-2011, 11:24 PM

Just wondering since I havent really seen too many dynos of FBO without meth, what HP/TQ delta would the same mods provided if he didnt have meth?

cstmx_ryder · 04-13-2011, 11:36 PM

I'd say anywhere from 95 to 105?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dadgar

Just wondering since I havent really seen too many dynos of FBO without meth, what HP/TQ delta would the same mods provided if he didnt have meth?

OpenFlash · 04-13-2011, 11:48 PM

Get rid of the stock catback and get another 15-20hp with no other changes

ETS Michael · 04-13-2011, 11:50 PM

Great Results. Shiv speaks the truth

Still have secondary cats?

hotrod182 · 04-14-2011, 12:50 AM

Wow, I thought the stock catback was pretty good. Its all I ever used. I figure if it can handle over 133mph trap speeds, it must flow decently. I was testing the other night on the stock rear exhaust. Got a 11.7 at 123 mph with mediocre 2.0 sec 60' time! And a 60-130 time of 9.22 seconds.

To gain 20hp AND lose weight, this car would be ridiculously fast! I don't know about being fully catless with all the noise and odors, etc....but so damn tempting!

Mike@N54Tuning.com · 04-14-2011, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Get rid of the stock catback and get another 15-20hp with no other changes

I think that's pretty optimistic. BMS made 445rw stock turbo through the factory single 2.75" catback with secondary cats. Then 540rw with the same exhaust setup with nitrous. On their 335i they also made 440rw through the stock catback and secondary cats. Those factory catbacks flow very well!

Mike

litz4244 · 04-14-2011, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ETS Michael

Great Results. Shiv speaks the truth

Still have secondary cats?

Yes Michael it still has secondary cats on it. Can u please pm a price of a cat back shipped to 19711 thanks.

I know they were having trouble keeping it full throttle without it kicking down to 3rd gear so I don't know if that has anything to do with it. Also does my boost look kinda low on the graph or is that normal?

themyst · 04-14-2011, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com

I think that's pretty optimistic. BMS made 445rw stock turbo through the factory single 2.75" catback with secondary cats. Then 540rw with the same exhaust setup with nitrous. On their 335i they also made 440rw through the stock catback and secondary cats. Those factory catbacks flow very well!

Mike

Again, the baseline makes the difference. 380 whp with a 240 whp baseline is as impressive as 440 whp with a 300 whp baseline.

The OPs numbers could be par for the course if he would dyno in the 280 whp range on stock boost. Now, if he dynos 300+ whp on stock boost, well then its not so impressive.

DaFish · 04-14-2011, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotrod182

Wow, I thought the stock catback was pretty good. Its all I ever used. I figure if it can handle over 133mph trap speeds, it must flow decently. I was testing the other night on the stock rear exhaust. Got a 11.7 at 123 mph with mediocre 2.0 sec 60' time! And a 60-130 time of 9.22 seconds.

To gain 20hp AND lose weight, this car would be ridiculously fast! I don't know about being fully catless with all the noise and odors, etc....but so damn tempting!

You and your car is incredible.... "this car would be ridiculously fast! " it already is !!! I would agree with you, don't go for the smell and mess up your DD.

Now, the catless DPs and stock exhaust don't add smell - Do you have those?

litz4244 · 04-14-2011, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFish

You and your car is incredible.... "this car would be ridiculously fast! " it already is !!! I would agree with you, don't go for the smell and mess up your DD.

Now, the catless DPs and stock exhaust don't add smell - Do you have those?

Yeah i have the catless downpipes. The car isnt my daily but i agree i dont want the noise from a catback.

Rotorocious · 04-14-2011, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Get rid of the stock catback and get another 15-20hp with no other changes

Really? What if I had the cattless downpipes and secondary cats removed, would the rest of the stock exhaust still be a bottleneck or is it just the cats causing it?

04-13-2011, 09:24 PM	#1
litz4244 First Lieutenant 27 Rep 309 Posts Drives: m6gc Join Date: May 2010 Location: delaware iTrader: (2)	procede dic 3-30 dyno fbo plus meth vehicle is a 2007 335 automatic Mods are Ets fmic 5inch plm downpipes stock catback procede v5 with dic 3-30 maps procede meth kit mixed 75/25 meth water with cm10 nozzle Hardpipe with tial bov Boost settings start boost 17psi max 18.5 with 10 percent ic
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

04-13-2011, 09:35 PM	#2
Sniz Lieutenant General 656 Rep 10,587 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	afr's look good and safe. Most will expect more HP on a dynojet but who knows without a baseline. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 09:40 PM	#3
litz4244 First Lieutenant 27 Rep 309 Posts Drives: m6gc Join Date: May 2010 Location: delaware iTrader: (2)	Yeah i was honeslty expecting a little bit more too but i was told the stock catback is restrictive.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 09:41 PM	#4
cn555ic 441 Rep 18,331 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: US iTrader: (6)	Did you log the run with the Procede Reader?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 09:49 PM	#5
litz4244 First Lieutenant 27 Rep 309 Posts Drives: m6gc Join Date: May 2010 Location: delaware iTrader: (2)	no i wasnt there my buddy took the car for me today. i kinda wish i did log it to see what was going on.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 10:08 PM	#6
Brey335i Banned 112 Rep 4,771 Posts Drives: e46 ///M3 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Austin, TX iTrader: (11)	I was expecting closer to 420 whp... too bad you don't have a baseline
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 10:25 PM	#7
litz4244 First Lieutenant 27 Rep 309 Posts Drives: m6gc Join Date: May 2010 Location: delaware iTrader: (2)	Yeah I was expecting that too. Yeah I have no baseline unfortantly. The only thing I cansay is the car went 13.5 at 103 stock. I want to put a cat back on and do some logs and go back and try again.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 11:01 PM	#8
themyst Major General 177 Rep 6,631 Posts Drives: '16 MK7 GTI Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: NYC iTrader: (8)	Without baseline it's hard to give any meaningful comments. Just an FYI, I did 413whp with 295 baseline on the old v4 maps on a 135i with same mods at 17.5 psi. I believe the stock exhaust is even more restrictive than the 335i. I did 424whp at 18.5psi. 93 octane + meth. __________________ E90 LCI N54 6AT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 11:14 PM	#9
cstmx_ryder Colonel 164 Rep 2,875 Posts Drives: A metal box with a roundel Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Portland, OR iTrader: (2)	Ya, I'd say that the trend has been ~420/420 on average. But like others have said, without a baseline, it's just another dyno run...... __________________ '08 AW E90 335i PROcede V5 \| BMS DCI \| RR DPs \| ETS FMIC \| FORGE DVs \| Stett CP \| Vanguard \| PSS10
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 11:24 PM	#10
dadgar Private First Class 14 Rep 130 Posts Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: May 2010 Location: Boston, MA iTrader: (3)	Just wondering since I havent really seen too many dynos of FBO without meth, what HP/TQ delta would the same mods provided if he didnt have meth?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 11:48 PM	#12
OpenFlash 1737 Rep 17,960 Posts Drives: A Lot Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay, CA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00] 2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00]	Get rid of the stock catback and get another 15-20hp with no other changes
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-13-2011, 11:50 PM	#13
ETS Michael Major 76 Rep 1,155 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: May 2009 Location: Vancouver, WA iTrader: (4)	Great Results. Shiv speaks the truth Still have secondary cats?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-14-2011, 12:50 AM	#14
hotrod182 . 812 Rep 3,974 Posts Drives: 2023 i4 M50 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: California iTrader: (0)	Wow, I thought the stock catback was pretty good. Its all I ever used. I figure if it can handle over 133mph trap speeds, it must flow decently. I was testing the other night on the stock rear exhaust. Got a 11.7 at 123 mph with mediocre 2.0 sec 60' time! And a 60-130 time of 9.22 seconds. To gain 20hp AND lose weight, this car would be ridiculously fast! I don't know about being fully catless with all the noise and odors, etc....but so damn tempting! __________________ 2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph 2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) Last edited by hotrod182; 04-14-2011 at 08:33 AM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote