E90Post
 


TNT Racewerks
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BMW E90/E92/E93 3-series General Forums > General E90 Sedan / E91 Wagon / E92 Coupe / E93 Cabrio > Test Drove the New Mustang 5.0



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-17-2010, 06:09 PM   #1
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

Test Drove the New Mustang 5.0

Current Cars: V4 equipped E93 and my wife's JB3 Equipped 135.

I stopped by the local Ford dealership to see what all the hype was about over the new Mustang GT 5.0. I test drove a white on red GT premium, sticker $32K.

Impression of the exterior: The lines are dull but were enhanced by a front lip and rear deck spoiler, it also had a cool looking hood cowling which lost all its coolness when I realized it was not functional. The white was un-inspiring but they had a boss blue and black one in the inventory which were nice looking. The ride height is about 2 inches too high...there was a canyon between the tires and the fenders, the factory equipped 18's were pretty drab as well so one would have to equip the car with a serious drop and some nice 19's (the GT500 sports staggered gunmetal 19's front and 20's in rear which was really sweet). There is an optional Brembo brake upgrade which I would consider a must as well.

Interior: Typical Detroit design, not much better than any other Mustang I have ridden in, the red leather was comfortable but coming from a BMW it all seemed cheap and hallow. The hood cowling dominated the forward view and the rear spoiler blocked my view beyond the rear of the car...it really did seem pretty bad how much the spoiler was right in the way of seeing traffic behind me. The shifter was incredibly short and the notch was very weak making me think that it had not slipped into gear when it actually had. It also seemed to naturally guide into 6th on what should have been the 3rd to 4th throw even at WOT. There was a really cool full glass roof option that I would consider a must!

Motor: The new 5.0 motor has a lot of grunt, and was very spirited up top. The gurgle of the exhaust was pretty cool and it revved freely. The bog of power between shifts was pretty bad, coming from the boost holding auto n54. I could tell the car was slower then the E93 and a lot slower than the 135 (both tuned). Even for me coming from the E93 land yacht, the mustang felt incredibly heavy. It just felt like a massive presence all around me. I believe with I/H/E and tune to free up another 50 hp or so the car would feel lighter and more responsive, much like a tune compliments our cars.

Suspension: This was a big improvement! The car was very responsive even thought it felt heavy and floaty in a strait line. It pulled through curves very nicely and kept the power on the ground surprisingly well.

Overall Impression: While the suspension and motor are noticeably improved, the car still lacks much refinement. Spec'd out properly I would put the 5.0 around $35K and I would have to put a good $12000 into appearance and performance mods to be satisfied with it, at which point I might as well put down the cash for the GT500. It was fun to drive simply because of the novelty surrounding a redneck icon, every person and their mother I drove by was starring me down. But I believe that stigma will fade when every person and their mother owns one like with the Camaro. So while it is a great improvement and a great bang for your buck car...I just couldn't justify buying it when I am so used to the refinement and total car feeling you can get from a bimmer.
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports

Last edited by Curt2000; 09-17-2010 at 07:56 PM..
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 06:17 PM   #2
J02 335i
Lieutenant Colonel
J02 335i's Avatar
Canada
39
Rep
1,558
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Good review, exactly what I expected.
__________________

Sport pack, JB3, Dci, factory oil cooler, 18" M3 reps, Michelin PSS, painted trim, black grills, smoked side markers, LED plate lights, H&R coils, Borla catback
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 06:28 PM   #3
Kroy
Brigadier General
Kroy's Avatar
United_States
173
Rep
3,032
Posts

Drives: E90
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (1)

Great review. A bit disappointed to hear how the 5.0 feels heavier than your e93 though.
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 06:29 PM   #4
ForTheD
Second Lieutenant
ForTheD's Avatar
United_States
19
Rep
251
Posts

Drives: 2007 e90 335i 6MT (ZSP)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Salem, OR

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 BMW 335i  [0.00]
Agreed, that is about what I pictured it to be like. Also I love my 4 doors!
Was a good read, thanks Curt!
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 06:32 PM   #5
Forcefed3
Banned
No_Country
127
Rep
4,732
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 335i  [1.00]
Yea, it seems to be a big improvement over the old mustangs. They still come up short of the E9x though. Id like to try out a GT500, even though it ran a 12.3 in the 1/4 mile...
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 06:50 PM   #6
zeenon53
Major
zeenon53's Avatar
39
Rep
1,154
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: obx

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by J02 335i View Post
Good review, exactly what I expected.

+1
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 06:52 PM   #7
TheStigsTwin
Captain
TheStigsTwin's Avatar
11
Rep
964
Posts

Drives: 2011 335xi
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Arizona

iTrader: (0)

Nice write up, unfortunately I predict you will be called a fanboy in the near future. My favorite thing about my 5.0 was that the engine sounded like a beast and was so tried and true and easy to work on and modify. The rest of the car was well....... ( although I personally liked the 6 speed on my Cobra). I have been reading of similar shift problems that you identified but mostly slipping into 4th instead of 2nd. I have to say that I was thinking: if BMW is losing its edge as the premier sports coupe/sports sedan builder then who is the most likely candidate to step into that vacuum? Ford? Seems unlikely but it would be nice.
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 07:43 PM   #8
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kroy View Post
Great review. A bit disappointed to hear how the 5.0 feels heavier than your e93 though.
I think it was a power to weight ratio thing...stock for stock the E93 would feel heavier, I'm sure with a few power mods it would overcome the sluggish feeling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbreeE90 View Post
Yea, it seems to be a big improvement over the old mustangs. They still come up short of the E9x though. Id like to try out a GT500, even though it ran a 12.3 in the 1/4 mile...
They had a GT500 on the showroom floor, it was pretty sweet but they had it marked up $10,000 over MSRP LMAO...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStigsTwin View Post
Nice write up, unfortunately I predict you will be called a fanboy in the near future. My favorite thing about my 5.0 was that the engine sounded like a beast and was so tried and true and easy to work on and modify. The rest of the car was well....... ( although I personally liked the 6 speed on my Cobra). I have been reading of similar shift problems that you identified but mostly slipping into 4th instead of 2nd. I have to say that I was thinking: if BMW is losing its edge as the premier sports coupe/sports sedan builder then who is the most likely candidate to step into that vacuum? Ford? Seems unlikely but it would be nice.
I admit I am a little bias but was putting thought into offloading my E93, maybe the GT500 would have swayed me but not the 5.0.
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 08:09 PM   #9
Forcefed3
Banned
No_Country
127
Rep
4,732
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2008 335i  [1.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt2000 View Post
I think it was a power to weight ratio thing...stock for stock the E93 would feel heavier, I'm sure with a few power mods it would overcome the sluggish feeling.



They had a GT500 on the showroom floor, it was pretty sweet but they had it marked up $10,000 over MSRP LMAO...



I admit I am a little bias but was putting thought into offloading my E93, maybe the GT500 would have swayed me but not the 5.0.
Ive heard the GT500 isnt that great even with the extra 100hp. I know its heavy, but shouldn't the 1/4 times be better than 12.3-12.5?
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 08:14 PM   #10
jopa489
Major General
United_States
122
Rep
6,594
Posts

Drives: Anything with Wheels
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA

iTrader: (9)

Quote:
Originally Posted by J02 335i View Post
Good review, exactly what I expected.
+2.
__________________

X7 LCI // Incoming
C7 ZR1 ZTK // Sebring + TRX // Hydro + Raptor Gen1 Roush // Tuxedo
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 10:06 PM   #11
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

I just re-built the car with all the options I wanted and it actually came out to $39K...starting to not be such a great deal after all.
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 10:07 PM   #12
galahad05
Brigadier General
galahad05's Avatar
158
Rep
3,158
Posts

Drives: '07 335i e90
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island NY

iTrader: (0)

Depends on whether you're comparing it to a 335 (which is seriously down on power and track prowess compared to it) or an M3.
__________________
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
--Mark Twain
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 10:19 PM   #13
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

From a price point perspective you have to compare it to the 335i...the M3 should be taking on the GT500.
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 11:48 PM   #14
dhowdy
New Member
0
Rep
8
Posts

Drives: bmw
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt2000 View Post
not much better than any other Mustang I have ridden in
What other mustang? The new generation's interior is such an improvement over the previous mustangs.
Quote:
The hood cowling dominated the forward view
lol?
Quote:
There was a really cool full glass roof option that I would consider a must!
You say the glass roof is a must and complain about weight at the same time?
Quote:
The bog of power between shifts was pretty bad
Sounds like driver error...
Quote:
Even for me coming from the E93 land yacht, the mustang felt incredibly heavy.
It may indeed be heavier than a e93, but compare it to the titanic that is the camaro or challenger and it seems quite lean.
Quote:
I would have to put a good $12000 into appearance and performance mods to be satisfied with it
Wow, that's a lot. What exactly would you plan on doing? Though it's the hot, new thing, mods for the mustang would be considerably less than that of your BMW. Also, I believe the GT500 still uses the old modular 4.6, which is pretty much capped out unless you want to go FI. If the plan is to mod regardless, the 5.0 is definitely the better bet.

I'm a huge fan of domestic muscle in case you couldn't tell, so please don't take anything I've said personally. Someone has to be the voice of "reason"
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 11:56 PM   #15
galahad05
Brigadier General
galahad05's Avatar
158
Rep
3,158
Posts

Drives: '07 335i e90
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Island NY

iTrader: (0)

One correction: The GT is about the same weight as an e90 (3605 pounds, with manual trans.). Lighter than an e93.
Note that I'm not saying that the GT didn't feel heavier, but that it actually is lighter.
__________________
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
--Mark Twain
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 12:13 AM   #16
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
What other mustang? The new generation's interior is such an improvement over the previous mustangs.
Ex Gf had an 04 then an 06, the interior is updated but by no means stunning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
lol?
It really did, I'm a tall guy and I still felt like I had to lean up and forward to see less than 20 feet in front of the car, the hood is very high to begin with and the cowl made it even worse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
You say the glass roof is a must and complain about weight at the same time?
it was cool enough to warrant the extra fat...certainly less than a hard top convertible which I am obviously a proponent of!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
Sounds like driver error...
As for the 'bogging' it can be attributed to the difference in feel between N/A and turbo. With my two tuned N54's the boost is held between shifts which gives you a steady power delivery between gears. The torque band is still coming on strong at the beginning of the next gear which always provides a great sensation of acceleration.

With the Mustang the shift was met with a quick grunt and chirp of the tires in lower gears and a disappointing feeling of loosing momentum until the RPMs built back up. From 6-7K the GT felt very strong but the lower RPM ranges left me wanting for a car with more area under the power curve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
It may indeed be heavier than a e93, but compare it to the titanic that is the camaro or challenger and it seems quite lean.
Agreed, but you under-estimate the whaleness of my 3900 lb 3er...I'm pretty sure it leaves grooves in soft pavement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
Wow, that's a lot. What exactly would you plan on doing? Though it's the hot, new thing, mods for the mustang would be considerably less than that of your BMW. Also, I believe the GT500 still uses the old modular 4.6, which is pretty much capped out unless you want to go FI. If the plan is to mod regardless, the 5.0 is definitely the better bet.
$2K on rims/tires, $1K Coilovers, header/exhaust ~$2.5K, various cosmetics ~1K, Ford Supercharger (keeps factory warranty!) $7.5K
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 12:26 AM   #17
dhowdy
New Member
0
Rep
8
Posts

Drives: bmw
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: MD

iTrader: (0)

I didn't bother looking up the weight on the e93, I just assumed it was light from your post. I'm not an expert on BMW's by any means. My little 325 is just meant to look good and be comfortable... not my go fast car.

And I guess if you plan on getting a factory supercharger, 12k is certainly within bounds.

Sounds good though man. If it were my money though, it'd be a GT over the BMW any day.

I think the biggest thing I hate about the new Mustang (and ford cards in general) is that awful brown leather they decided to throw in them. Looks terrible in my opinion, but to each his own I guess...
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 12:32 AM   #18
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
I didn't bother looking up the weight on the e93, I just assumed it was light from your post. I'm not an expert on BMW's by any means. My little 325 is just meant to look good and be comfortable... not my go fast car.

And I guess if you plan on getting a factory supercharger, 12k is certainly within bounds.

Sounds good though man. If it were my money though, it'd be a GT over the BMW any day.

I think the biggest thing I hate about the new Mustang (and ford cards in general) is that awful brown leather they decided to throw in them. Looks terrible in my opinion, but to each his own I guess...

It was certainly a great car for the price point...but unfortunately I'm a status seeking douche and just cant imagine getting in the GT after the 335i...the GT500 though...that may fit the bill, but I'll be hard pressed to get a test drive.
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 01:10 AM   #19
Brey335i
Banned
112
Rep
4,771
Posts

Drives: e46 ///M3
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhowdy View Post
Also, I believe the GT500 still uses the old modular 4.6, which is pretty much capped out unless you want to go FI. If the plan is to mod regardless, the 5.0 is definitely the better bet.
No. The GT500 uses the 5.4 liter V8 originally used in the Ford GT supercar...
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 01:36 AM   #20
shockin330i
Brigadier General
shockin330i's Avatar
798
Rep
4,784
Posts

Drives: 2016 ZCP M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: f y'all, I'm from Texas (RGV)

iTrader: (1)

The reason the 5.0 feels slower is because the n54 has a a lot of torque down low
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 04:35 AM   #21
persian54
Lieutenant General
persian54's Avatar
United_States
923
Rep
15,818
Posts

Drives: M760/G83M4
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Valley, SoCal

iTrader: (298)

drop top bro! don't lose it lol

get an e93 M3

though price difference is massive
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 09:26 AM   #22
Curt2000
Brigadier General
Curt2000's Avatar
United_States
1013
Rep
3,157
Posts

Drives: '93 Supra Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shockin330i View Post
The reason the 5.0 feels slower is because the n54 has a a lot of torque down low
Yeah there was a lot of talk about it having a new Aluminum block which saves 120lbs or so over the old version.
__________________

Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread)
Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread)
INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST