|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Test Drove the New Mustang 5.0
|
|
09-17-2010, 06:09 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
Test Drove the New Mustang 5.0
Current Cars: V4 equipped E93 and my wife's JB3 Equipped 135.
I stopped by the local Ford dealership to see what all the hype was about over the new Mustang GT 5.0. I test drove a white on red GT premium, sticker $32K. Impression of the exterior: The lines are dull but were enhanced by a front lip and rear deck spoiler, it also had a cool looking hood cowling which lost all its coolness when I realized it was not functional. The white was un-inspiring but they had a boss blue and black one in the inventory which were nice looking. The ride height is about 2 inches too high...there was a canyon between the tires and the fenders, the factory equipped 18's were pretty drab as well so one would have to equip the car with a serious drop and some nice 19's (the GT500 sports staggered gunmetal 19's front and 20's in rear which was really sweet). There is an optional Brembo brake upgrade which I would consider a must as well. Interior: Typical Detroit design, not much better than any other Mustang I have ridden in, the red leather was comfortable but coming from a BMW it all seemed cheap and hallow. The hood cowling dominated the forward view and the rear spoiler blocked my view beyond the rear of the car...it really did seem pretty bad how much the spoiler was right in the way of seeing traffic behind me. The shifter was incredibly short and the notch was very weak making me think that it had not slipped into gear when it actually had. It also seemed to naturally guide into 6th on what should have been the 3rd to 4th throw even at WOT. There was a really cool full glass roof option that I would consider a must! Motor: The new 5.0 motor has a lot of grunt, and was very spirited up top. The gurgle of the exhaust was pretty cool and it revved freely. The bog of power between shifts was pretty bad, coming from the boost holding auto n54. I could tell the car was slower then the E93 and a lot slower than the 135 (both tuned). Even for me coming from the E93 land yacht, the mustang felt incredibly heavy. It just felt like a massive presence all around me. I believe with I/H/E and tune to free up another 50 hp or so the car would feel lighter and more responsive, much like a tune compliments our cars. Suspension: This was a big improvement! The car was very responsive even thought it felt heavy and floaty in a strait line. It pulled through curves very nicely and kept the power on the ground surprisingly well. Overall Impression: While the suspension and motor are noticeably improved, the car still lacks much refinement. Spec'd out properly I would put the 5.0 around $35K and I would have to put a good $12000 into appearance and performance mods to be satisfied with it, at which point I might as well put down the cash for the GT500. It was fun to drive simply because of the novelty surrounding a redneck icon, every person and their mother I drove by was starring me down. But I believe that stigma will fade when every person and their mother owns one like with the Camaro. So while it is a great improvement and a great bang for your buck car...I just couldn't justify buying it when I am so used to the refinement and total car feeling you can get from a bimmer.
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports Last edited by Curt2000; 09-17-2010 at 07:56 PM.. |
09-17-2010, 06:17 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
39
Rep 1,558
Posts |
Good review, exactly what I expected.
__________________
Sport pack, JB3, Dci, factory oil cooler, 18" M3 reps, Michelin PSS, painted trim, black grills, smoked side markers, LED plate lights, H&R coils, Borla catback |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 06:29 PM | #4 |
Second Lieutenant
19
Rep 251
Posts
Drives: 2007 e90 335i 6MT (ZSP)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Salem, OR
|
Agreed, that is about what I pictured it to be like. Also I love my 4 doors!
Was a good read, thanks Curt! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 06:32 PM | #5 |
Banned
127
Rep 4,732
Posts |
Yea, it seems to be a big improvement over the old mustangs. They still come up short of the E9x though. Id like to try out a GT500, even though it ran a 12.3 in the 1/4 mile...
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 06:52 PM | #7 |
Captain
11
Rep 964
Posts |
Nice write up, unfortunately I predict you will be called a fanboy in the near future. My favorite thing about my 5.0 was that the engine sounded like a beast and was so tried and true and easy to work on and modify. The rest of the car was well....... ( although I personally liked the 6 speed on my Cobra). I have been reading of similar shift problems that you identified but mostly slipping into 4th instead of 2nd. I have to say that I was thinking: if BMW is losing its edge as the premier sports coupe/sports sedan builder then who is the most likely candidate to step into that vacuum? Ford? Seems unlikely but it would be nice.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 07:43 PM | #8 | |||
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 08:09 PM | #9 | |
Banned
127
Rep 4,732
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 08:14 PM | #10 |
Major General
122
Rep 6,594
Posts |
__________________
X7 LCI // Incoming C7 ZR1 ZTK // Sebring + TRX // Hydro + Raptor Gen1 Roush // Tuxedo |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 10:06 PM | #11 |
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
I just re-built the car with all the options I wanted and it actually came out to $39K...starting to not be such a great deal after all.
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 10:07 PM | #12 |
Brigadier General
158
Rep 3,158
Posts |
Depends on whether you're comparing it to a 335 (which is seriously down on power and track prowess compared to it) or an M3.
__________________
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
--Mark Twain |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 10:19 PM | #13 |
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
From a price point perspective you have to compare it to the 335i...the M3 should be taking on the GT500.
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 11:48 PM | #14 | |||||
New Member
0
Rep 8
Posts |
What other mustang? The new generation's interior is such an improvement over the previous mustangs.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm a huge fan of domestic muscle in case you couldn't tell, so please don't take anything I've said personally. Someone has to be the voice of "reason" |
|||||
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2010, 11:56 PM | #15 |
Brigadier General
158
Rep 3,158
Posts |
One correction: The GT is about the same weight as an e90 (3605 pounds, with manual trans.). Lighter than an e93.
Note that I'm not saying that the GT didn't feel heavier, but that it actually is lighter.
__________________
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
--Mark Twain |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 12:13 AM | #16 | ||||
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
Quote:
It really did, I'm a tall guy and I still felt like I had to lean up and forward to see less than 20 feet in front of the car, the hood is very high to begin with and the cowl made it even worse. Quote:
As for the 'bogging' it can be attributed to the difference in feel between N/A and turbo. With my two tuned N54's the boost is held between shifts which gives you a steady power delivery between gears. The torque band is still coming on strong at the beginning of the next gear which always provides a great sensation of acceleration. With the Mustang the shift was met with a quick grunt and chirp of the tires in lower gears and a disappointing feeling of loosing momentum until the RPMs built back up. From 6-7K the GT felt very strong but the lower RPM ranges left me wanting for a car with more area under the power curve. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 12:26 AM | #17 |
New Member
0
Rep 8
Posts |
I didn't bother looking up the weight on the e93, I just assumed it was light from your post. I'm not an expert on BMW's by any means. My little 325 is just meant to look good and be comfortable... not my go fast car.
And I guess if you plan on getting a factory supercharger, 12k is certainly within bounds. Sounds good though man. If it were my money though, it'd be a GT over the BMW any day. I think the biggest thing I hate about the new Mustang (and ford cards in general) is that awful brown leather they decided to throw in them. Looks terrible in my opinion, but to each his own I guess... |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 12:32 AM | #18 | |
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
Quote:
It was certainly a great car for the price point...but unfortunately I'm a status seeking douche and just cant imagine getting in the GT after the 335i...the GT500 though...that may fit the bill, but I'll be hard pressed to get a test drive.
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 01:10 AM | #19 |
Banned
112
Rep 4,771
Posts |
No. The GT500 uses the 5.4 liter V8 originally used in the Ford GT supercar...
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 04:35 AM | #21 |
Lieutenant General
923
Rep 15,818
Posts |
drop top bro! don't lose it lol
get an e93 M3 though price difference is massive
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 09:26 AM | #22 |
Brigadier General
1013
Rep 3,157
Posts |
Yeah there was a lot of talk about it having a new Aluminum block which saves 120lbs or so over the old version.
__________________
Former Car: '16 SUNBURST GOLD F80 ///M3--6MT/Carbon Cloth (ED Thread) Former Car:'13 SANTORINI BLUE E92///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP(ED Thread) INSTAGRAM:@C2KMotorsports |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|