11-26-2014, 06:31 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
130
Rep 413
Posts |
Fuel tank size....or lack of
It's a good job the 335d is so fantastic in every other area, filling up every day at the moment! Why on Earth didn't they fit a tank more appropriate to its strengths as a long distance cruiser?
5 days in & 1500 miles passed now. God I love this car. |
11-26-2014, 06:45 AM | #2 |
Major General
4271
Rep 6,945
Posts |
Agree completely. The F10 has a 70 litre tank rather than 57 litres. Those extra 13 litres provide not just an extra 20% range since most of us fill up some time before empty, so in effect it is more like 25-30% extra range.
I wonder if the tank has to be say half full for the official fuel economy tests, thereby encouraging smaller tanks? Surely it would make more sense for the test to specify a set volume of fuel to avoid this. At the very least, they should offer a larger tank option. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 07:01 AM | #3 |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Yep, the curb weight which all tests go by stipulate a 90% fuel load, so a smaller tank is of benefit. The 5 series carries a 13kg penalty over the 3 series because of this.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 07:11 AM | #4 | |
Major General
4271
Rep 6,945
Posts |
Quote:
It is very annoying that they don't consider this sort of unintended consequence when designing these tests. I think I read that Merc had fitted an insanely small 41 litre tank to their C Class as standard, which must be a result of this. I believe that UK models have a larger tank though. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 07:19 AM | #5 | |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
90% fuel load does seem inappropriate, especially as they have used a woman's weight as 'the driver', and we all know women never 'fill up' they only put a tenner in at a time. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 07:46 AM | #6 |
Major General
3719
Rep 8,636
Posts |
Yeah smaller tank and thus range compared to my E92 330d, its a bit of a niggle I must admit, the car is much bigger, but has a smaller tank!
That said it costs me no more than around 80 quid max to fill up, and compared to other people I speak to too whose cars have bigger tanks and cost way north of 100 quid theres something nice about it not being so high lol! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 08:13 AM | #7 |
YOLO
440
Rep 2,854
Posts |
Does anyone know how much say 50kg costs to transport?
Just if you wanted max mpg, would you be best to do 1/2 tanks? I filled up ONCE, rest of time £10 sometimes £6 (I don't go very far) |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 08:23 AM | #8 |
General
6733
Rep 20,651
Posts |
Not having correct tyre pressures and air temp has a greater impact than 50kg.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 09:11 AM | #10 |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 09:18 AM | #11 |
YOLO
440
Rep 2,854
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 10:07 AM | #12 |
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
I thought they made it smaller because the mpg has increased!?
I got 500 miles before filling up in my E90 320d, and i still get 500 miles in my F30 330d! Obviously the figures compared to an E90 330d would be even more favourable! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 10:08 AM | #13 |
Lieutenant
130
Rep 413
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 10:22 AM | #16 |
General
8567
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
I've averaged 386 miles per tank since new, which perhaps says more about my driving than the fuel tank size, but I really wish it was larger, mainly as I regularly drive from home to my parents in Scotland and it's 440 miles, so right on the limit of being doable on 1 tank if I drive fast... Which means I end of up getting fleeced by having to use to fill up at motorway service stations.
And my OCD only allows me to fill up completely, otherwise it messes up my fuel spreadsheet! So 70 litres would be ideal for me.
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 11:43 AM | #18 |
General
8567
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
From Herts to Perth is Motorway all the way so not without coming off, which is a faff. And as mentioned, I don't do half fill ups!
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 11:44 AM | #19 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
We really have a decent range on tanks these days, whatever the moans.
Go back a few years and many cars didn't have much more than a 200 mile range, totally normal. My first car, I'd put in 6 gallons and it was full, 200 miles later and another 6 gallons... Even my first BMW 5-series (E12) had a 70 litre tank, but 20mpg was a good return, to get over 280 miles before refilling was a good run. To be fair with increased mpg these days why do we need to carry the weight around when we still get a decent range? Don't forget even 535d owners get over 50mpg. HighlandPete |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 11:56 AM | #20 |
YOLO
440
Rep 2,854
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 11:57 AM | #21 |
General
8567
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
I mean that if I am putting fuel in my tank then it is always to fill it up completely, otherwise you can't do a proper measure of your fuel consumption.
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2014, 12:01 PM | #22 | |
Lieutenant
83
Rep 418
Posts |
Quote:
And anyway, my S4 had the same fuel capacity as my 335, and did 200 miles between fill ups. Now that's worth moaning about - the 335 does more than double, and is nicer, quicker faster etc etc...! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|