|
08-24-2009, 08:26 PM | #1 |
I'm kind of a bitch
396
Rep 895
Posts |
EOS Rebel T1i EF-S
Yes? No? Anyone have one?
It will be my first DSLR camera, I'm coming from a Leica C-LUX 1. The saturation and color it picks up are great, but I'm just looking for a little more now. Want to be able to control everything manually. Depth of field etc. I'm a new, newbie when it comes to actually TAKING the photos. Probably should have just started this thread instead of the other one. Thanks guys! |
08-24-2009, 08:28 PM | #2 |
Night Sh1ft
471
Rep 3,079
Posts Drives: F95 X5MC LCI Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: It's bobsled time
|
good body, just make sure you get good glass
you'll benefit more from good glass then the body
__________________
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson |
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2009, 08:34 PM | #3 |
I'm kind of a bitch
396
Rep 895
Posts |
Something I know nothing about.....yet. It comes with a kit lens, which I read aren't really very good, but probably OK for a beginner like me?
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2009, 08:58 PM | #4 |
Night Sh1ft
471
Rep 3,079
Posts Drives: F95 X5MC LCI Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: It's bobsled time
|
kit lens should be fine, but if high quality output is your goal, perhaps just buy the body, and get the canon 17-55 F 2.8 IS lens for walkaround high quality, and perhaps one of canons 70-200 IS variations for the longer end....
but then its a question of budget as well... what you looking to spend on the body+lens+filters?
__________________
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson |
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2009, 09:10 PM | #5 |
我的車車有Turbo&!!!
157
Rep 2,597
Posts Drives: 빠른차 Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ?????
|
+1 for T1i
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2009, 11:46 PM | #7 |
Free Thinker
19151
Rep 7,539
Posts |
Been thinking about this one myself. Pushing the budget limits, though. Been thinking about maybe going with the cheaper XSi and better glass for the same $$$.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2009, 12:02 AM | #8 |
Colonel
153
Rep 2,368
Posts |
i was about to buy the t1i also but ended up with a d90. The D90 feels more solid and some website did a side by side comparison and said the D90 would be better than the t1i.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2009, 12:36 AM | #9 |
Major General
3646
Rep 9,783
Posts |
Some website did but the rest of the websites pretty much either stated that they are both equally or that the T1i is a bit better (for one thing I believe the T1i records in 1080 while the D90 only records in 720?).
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2009, 06:33 AM | #10 |
Captain
56
Rep 815
Posts |
Garbage cause it's 20 fps or cause you've actually seen the output quality and found it to be poor? The 1080P samples I've seen weren't going to win Oscars but didn't look particularly jerky to me. In any case, it'll do 30 fps in 720P while the D90 records in 24 fps.
I agree, though, that the video is of minor importance compared to the quality of the still recording. Both the D90 and T1i are very capable still cameras - that just happen to have HD video capability. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2009, 09:08 PM | #12 |
Major General
3646
Rep 9,783
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2009, 11:12 PM | #13 |
Colonel
153
Rep 2,368
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2009, 11:27 PM | #14 | |
Night Sh1ft
471
Rep 3,079
Posts Drives: F95 X5MC LCI Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: It's bobsled time
|
Quote:
and I would say the T1i is comparable to the D90 quality and feature wise, and the D300 is comparable to the 50D, and the D700 is somewhat comparable to the 5dmkii... is always a rough comparison...because each model has some benefits the other one doesnt
__________________
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2009, 12:05 AM | #15 | |
Colonel
153
Rep 2,368
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2009, 12:15 AM | #16 | |
Night Sh1ft
471
Rep 3,079
Posts Drives: F95 X5MC LCI Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: It's bobsled time
|
Quote:
the T1i has a different and better sensor than the XSi, includes HD video, and while it may look very similar, having a different sensor pretty much makes it a completely different camera. I think if you were deciding between the two, it would be a matter of personal preference to either the Nikon body/menu styles etc, and the Canon body/menu styles. Quality wise, both are very close, and both are pretty good.
__________________
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2009, 01:40 PM | #17 |
Major
76
Rep 1,324
Posts |
I have the XSi and am very pleased with it. True, the kit lens doesn't perform like the "L" lenses, but it's what, $100 more than the body-only? For EF-S bodies, the 17-55mm f/2.8 gets reviews that compare it to "L" lenses, by the way. But it will cost you more than the body itself. The Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 also gets good reviews, but has no image stabilizer.
Anyway, I'd imagine that the T1 would only be better than mine, since as mentioned, it has the 50D sensor (DIGIC IV instead of III). So I say go for it! And check out http://photography-on-the.net/forum/
__________________
Was: 2008 335xi sedan 6MT Black Sapphire Metallic
Is: 2014 Tesla P85D (Blue Metallic) Wife's: 2013 Infiniti G37 S sedan 6MT, Black |
Appreciate
0
|
09-03-2009, 01:48 AM | #20 |
Major General
666
Rep 8,800
Posts |
yes.
I'll vouch for the 720 for the T1i. it's good. 1080 function on T1i is short 4 frames of being perfect.
__________________
FrankiE90 AKA:.[The TANK] *CLICK THE SIG
E90s (been gone but not forgotten) • KW clubsports • • • • • • • • • • 18" BBS GT4 // Build E30 (pending) + E46 M3 Wagon ESTORIL Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|