New Ytest
Sign out
Bimmerpost
Login
BMW E39 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
Go Back   BMW E39 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-18-2015, 03:21 PM   #45
gonzo
Lieutenant General
gonzo's Avatar
United_States
10108
Rep
14,374
Posts

 
Drives: as many as possible
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TeXXXas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Leaf springs.

:: drops mic ::
Apparently they outshine a 340i. Imagine what would happen to a 228i.
__________________
Crazy Diamond
Appreciate 1
      11-18-2015, 03:22 PM   #46
David70
Colonel
United_States
1567
Rep
2,665
Posts

 
Drives: 06 Z4M Coupe - 13 Cadillac ATS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vigilante375 View Post
So they give the award to a car that is barely on the streets? I'm happy with the new Camaro but giving the award to a car that's barely out is pretty absurd and even more so for the "2016" car of the "year".

Great car but there is something better out there.
Waiting to test this car months from now would have changed what? They don't include reliability as part of their criteria.

What new model car available when they did their testing should have been included?
__________________
2006 Z4M Coupe - Stromung exhaust, ZHP knob, stubby antenna, clutch delay delete
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 04:58 PM   #47
Vigilante375
Major
United_States
116
Rep
1,158
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 AW 6M 135i
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: WA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by David70 View Post
Waiting to test this car months from now would have changed what? They don't include reliability as part of their criteria.

What new model car available when they did their testing should have been included?
Well were the cars that were in the runnings for this brand new, as in a new design for 2016? So in that case I don't know what other cars they could have put in since I don't know what other cars are waiting to be released. Maybe if they wanted a few months something else was coming due to be released and would have done better.

And also considering what the Camaro was up against, there is no reason why it would have not won. Now that I see what was tested and I'm sure they let it win to make the AMG or 7 series look bad since they cost soooo much.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 05:32 PM   #48
M2PDX
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
2905
Rep
1,593
Posts

 
Drives: 2017 M2
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheelwright View Post
Camaro SS is faster then M4 ( http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...-tested-review ) yet it costs about the same as above-poverty-specs 228i.

Based on this video
they improved interior quality and functionality as well. This car makes it harder and harder to justify paying BMW tax.
It may be faster, but in my eye it leaves a lot to be desired from a looks perspective, feels claustrophobic from the inside, and is something that a 20-something would drive. I've sat in them, and they seem cheap in many respects. I think I'll stick with my M3.

Just my opinion. Others will may disagree.

If I wanted the fastest car possible, I'd buy a used Z-06, but I don't really want or have much interest in a Corvette.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 05:44 PM   #49
Viffermike
Colonel
Viffermike's Avatar
United_States
1753
Rep
2,942
Posts

 
Drives: '18 black-n-blue 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Big D

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo View Post
Apparently they outshine a 340i. Imagine what would happen to a 228i.
Actually, I don't imagine that because I don't care. Leaf springs are an absolute deal breaker for me.

IOW: I don't care how fast, composed, nimble, mind- or crotch-blowing, etc. a car is if it has leaf springs, because I don't want to own a car with an inherently limited and inferior suspension design that only suits non-driven hubs and (barely) live axle applications and dates to the 19th century -- and that is now commonly used almost exclusively for heavy-load applications (trucks, trailers ... locomotives!!!).

There's a reason for that last part -- actually, two reasons: It's all but maintenance free for the life of the vehicle no matter what its intent, and it's comparatively cheap to produce.
__________________
--Life is a journey made more exciting with a fast car.--
--Helmets are for closers.--
<<Current: "Blackened" '18 NBM Porsche 718 Cayman ... Gone (but not forgotten): "Blackened" MG '15 228i M Sport w/aFe filter/scoop, Hertz drivers, P3Cars multigauge, other goodies>>
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 06:22 PM   #50
Wheelwright
Captain
Wheelwright's Avatar
Canada
463
Rep
778
Posts

 
Drives: M235i (6MT fakerich edition)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada, Oak Ridges

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustangquadcam View Post
It (Camaro) may be faster, but in my eye it leaves a lot to be desired from a looks perspective, feels claustrophobic from the inside, and is something that a 20-something would drive. I've sat in them, and they seem cheap in many respects. I think I'll stick with my M3.
Did you sit in the new one ? its interior looks improved. Also the reviews praise the new seats and steering wheel. I agree M3 has some compelling advantages over Camaro like all-around visibility and practicality but it is harder to make a case for M4 because like Camaro it is "claustrophobic" and impractical.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 06:28 PM   #51
Wheelwright
Captain
Wheelwright's Avatar
Canada
463
Rep
778
Posts

 
Drives: M235i (6MT fakerich edition)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada, Oak Ridges

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Actually, I don't imagine that because I don't care. Leaf springs are an absolute deal breaker for me.

IOW: I don't care how fast, composed, nimble, mind- or crotch-blowing, etc. a car is if it has leaf springs, because I don't want to own a car with an inherently limited and inferior suspension design that only suits non-driven hubs and (barely) live axle applications and dates to the 19th century
I don't think leaf-springs is the same as live-axle because Corvette suspension is still classified as independent which live-axle suspension isn't.

Now that's an interesting tidbit, according to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_spring the best SUV currently on the market: Volvo XC90 Mk. 2 actually uses leaf-suspension.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 07:08 PM   #52
aloksatoor
Second Lieutenant
21
Rep
232
Posts

 
Drives: Carrera S PDK
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

iTrader: (0)

You can always put in coileovers too. The porsche 928s also had torsion for the rears, they make great track cars too. As long as it works, what does it matter.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 07:29 PM   #53
Nitrousbird
Banned
432
Rep
1,602
Posts

 
Drives: '07 E92 335i 6MT
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Powell, OH

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Actually, I don't imagine that because I don't care. Leaf springs are an absolute deal breaker for me.

IOW: I don't care how fast, composed, nimble, mind- or crotch-blowing, etc. a car is if it has leaf springs, because I don't want to own a car with an inherently limited and inferior suspension design that only suits non-driven hubs and (barely) live axle applications and dates to the 19th century -- and that is now commonly used almost exclusively for heavy-load applications (trucks, trailers ... locomotives!!!).

There's a reason for that last part -- actually, two reasons: It's all but maintenance free for the life of the vehicle no matter what its intent, and it's comparatively cheap to produce.
I'll take a leaf spring, pushrod motor Vette any day over a slow ass 228. Just saying.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 07:51 PM   #54
David70
Colonel
United_States
1567
Rep
2,665
Posts

 
Drives: 06 Z4M Coupe - 13 Cadillac ATS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vigilante375 View Post
Well were the cars that were in the runnings for this brand new, as in a new design for 2016? So in that case I don't know what other cars they could have put in since I don't know what other cars are waiting to be released. Maybe if they wanted a few months something else was coming due to be released and would have done better.

And also considering what the Camaro was up against, there is no reason why it would have not won. Now that I see what was tested and I'm sure they let it win to make the AMG or 7 series look bad since they cost soooo much.
I believe they run the test at the same time every year and cars that came out since the last test are eligible. If it comes out after the test it is eligible for next years test. If they always waited for some car that was soon to come out they would never have the competition.

Cost is part of the criteria as a car that cost twice as much should be better. This doesn't mean they are trying to make another car "look bad".

You keep saying they let it win, they didn't test the right cars or they didn't wait long enough, what car do you think should have won (of all cars that came out since last Fall and considering price)?

I haven't seen the complete list of cars but the title in the link for the original post is -
Quote:
4 Days, 26 Cars, and One Bitchin’ Winner
__________________
2006 Z4M Coupe - Stromung exhaust, ZHP knob, stubby antenna, clutch delay delete

Last edited by David70; 11-18-2015 at 08:10 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 08:23 PM   #55
G8rGrl
Lieutenant
569
Rep
449
Posts

 
Drives: Like a Boss
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by David70 View Post
I believe they run the test at the same time every year and cars that came out since the last test are eligible. If it comes out after the test it is eligible for next years test. If they always waited for some car that was soon to come out they would never have the competition.

Cost is part of the criteria as a car that cost twice as much should be better. This doesn't mean they are trying to make another car "look bad".

You keep saying they let it win, they didn't test the right cars or they didn't wait long enough, what car do you think should have won (of all cars that came out since last Fall and considering price)?

I haven't seen the complete list of cars but the title in the link for the original post is -
I've noticed that some people on this forum get...reactive...when their $70,000 - $85,000 BMW purchase doesn't win a competition or an award. It's normal...people typically like to get confirmation/affirmation that they made the "best" decision and picked the "best" commodity.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 10:18 PM   #56
RM7
Brigadier General
RM7's Avatar
2870
Rep
3,445
Posts

 
Drives: Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alaska

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Actually, I don't imagine that because I don't care. Leaf springs are an absolute deal breaker for me.

IOW: I don't care how fast, composed, nimble, mind- or crotch-blowing, etc. a car is if it has leaf springs, because I don't want to own a car with an inherently limited and inferior suspension design that only suits non-driven hubs and (barely) live axle applications and dates to the 19th century -- and that is now commonly used almost exclusively for heavy-load applications (trucks, trailers ... locomotives!!!).

There's a reason for that last part -- actually, two reasons: It's all but maintenance free for the life of the vehicle no matter what its intent, and it's comparatively cheap to produce.

GM knows a thing or two about suspension. One only has to look as far as the Z28, SS 1LE, ZL1, ATS-V, CTS-V, SS, G8, etc...

The CG of the Corvette (the on with the leaf springs) is pretty low, coupled with it's magnetic ride suspension, it does things other cars can only dream of, with a ride quality that isn't "track-only car". A spring is a spring.
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2015, 11:14 PM   #57
M3_WC
Brigadier General
1040
Rep
3,622
Posts

 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Actually, I don't imagine that because I don't care. Leaf springs are an absolute deal breaker for me.

IOW: I don't care how fast, composed, nimble, mind- or crotch-blowing, etc. a car is if it has leaf springs, because I don't want to own a car with an inherently limited and inferior suspension design that only suits non-driven hubs and (barely) live axle applications and dates to the 19th century -- and that is now commonly used almost exclusively for heavy-load applications (trucks, trailers ... locomotives!!!).

There's a reason for that last part -- actually, two reasons: It's all but maintenance free for the life of the vehicle no matter what its intent, and it's comparatively cheap to produce.
First of all it isn't leaf springs. It is one composite leaf spring, that runs transvere. It is at the lowest point and presses against lower control arms. It has nothing to do with live rear axles or truck suspensions. The rear suspension is true double wishbone setup. They continue with this setup one because it works very well and its low center of gravity. Combined with world class leading magnetic ride, C7 suspension is one hell of a package.
Appreciate 1
      11-19-2015, 01:15 AM   #58
Viffermike
Colonel
Viffermike's Avatar
United_States
1753
Rep
2,942
Posts

 
Drives: '18 black-n-blue 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Big D

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitrousbird
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Actually, I don't imagine that because I don't care. Leaf springs are an absolute deal breaker for me.

IOW: I don't care how fast, composed, nimble, mind- or crotch-blowing, etc. a car is if it has leaf springs, because I don't want to own a car with an inherently limited and inferior suspension design that only suits non-driven hubs and (barely) live axle applications and dates to the 19th century -- and that is now commonly used almost exclusively for heavy-load applications (trucks, trailers ... locomotives!!!).

There's a reason for that last part -- actually, two reasons: It's all but maintenance free for the life of the vehicle no matter what its intent, and it's comparatively cheap to produce.
I'll take a leaf spring, pushrod motor Vette any day over a slow ass 228. Just saying.
Apples vs. oranges, man. But good for you. I'd get a used Cayman S before any 'vette. I won't bore you with the myriad of reasons why (transverse leaf spring notwithstanding. It's still a leaf spring.).
__________________
--Life is a journey made more exciting with a fast car.--
--Helmets are for closers.--
<<Current: "Blackened" '18 NBM Porsche 718 Cayman ... Gone (but not forgotten): "Blackened" MG '15 228i M Sport w/aFe filter/scoop, Hertz drivers, P3Cars multigauge, other goodies>>
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2015, 01:26 AM   #59
Vigilante375
Major
United_States
116
Rep
1,158
Posts

 
Drives: 2012 AW 6M 135i
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: WA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by David70 View Post
I believe they run the test at the same time every year and cars that came out since the last test are eligible. If it comes out after the test it is eligible for next years test. If they always waited for some car that was soon to come out they would never have the competition.

Cost is part of the criteria as a car that cost twice as much should be better. This doesn't mean they are trying to make another car "look bad".

You keep saying they let it win, they didn't test the right cars or they didn't wait long enough, what car do you think should have won (of all cars that came out since last Fall and considering price)?

I haven't seen the complete list of cars but the title in the link for the original post is -
Well how can a lowly Camaro SS edge out over a AMG GT S? This is what I found for a list, but its not 26 cars:
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2016-...dary-car-guys/

As far as suspension, the SS (1SS or 2SS) can be equipped with magnetic ride suspension. Say all you want about leaf springs but the Camaro and Corvette do very well against the euro cars in handling.

Like mentioned before, the 1LE, ZL1 and Z/28 lay down some amazing track times and handling numbers considering how much they weigh. Just because something doesn't have the latest and greatest technology doesn't mean it isn't going to do the same job well.
Appreciate 1
      11-19-2015, 08:28 AM   #60
fcman
Captain
654
Rep
976
Posts

 
Drives: 2023 G87
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (0)

Why the hell is everyone talking about leaf springs? The Camaro is on coils, as it has been for years and years.
Appreciate 1
      11-19-2015, 09:13 AM   #61
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4462
Rep
9,160
Posts

 
Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fcman
Why the hell is everyone talking about leaf springs? The Camaro is on coils, as it has been for years and years.
And the Corvette's aren't anything like the leaf springs people are referring to.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2015, 10:42 AM   #62
gonzo
Lieutenant General
gonzo's Avatar
United_States
10108
Rep
14,374
Posts

 
Drives: as many as possible
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TeXXXas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fcman View Post
Why the hell is everyone talking about leaf springs? The Camaro is on coils, as it has been for years and years.
I was stang stuck or something. Must take meds.
__________________
Crazy Diamond
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2015, 11:09 AM   #63
hellrotm
Banned
4143
Rep
6,926
Posts

 
Drives: F80
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ...Location...Location

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viffermike View Post
Leaf springs.

:: drops mic ::
Quote:
Originally Posted by fcman View Post
Why the hell is everyone talking about leaf springs? The Camaro is on coils, as it has been for years and years.
Not quite sure. Apparently viffermike is under the impression the Camaro uses leaf springs.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2015, 11:38 AM   #64
StealYourFace
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
260
Rep
1,794
Posts

 
Drives: F30 328i M 6mt, E36 M3
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Shakedown Street, Buffalo NY

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fcman View Post
With those wheel/tire sizes it's gonna be an expensive track car. Hopefully you'll be able to downsize to at least 18s. I like these cars but dropping $1400 on some tires for you track car is gonna hurt. It's the same reason I cant bring myself to put money down on the new Focus RS, even though it's looking like an almost a perfect car to me.
Of course you can fit 18" wheels on the new camaro... it has smallish brakes over those giant 20's.

I wish the car had smaller wheel openings (and 19s as the largest rim option, not 20s) ... along with of course a lower belt line and larger windows.

I'm thrilled to hear it is a great driving car (I had a few f body cars back in my college days) but looks aren't on its side.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2015, 11:46 AM   #65
fcman
Captain
654
Rep
976
Posts

 
Drives: 2023 G87
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StealYourFace View Post
Of course you can fit 18" wheels on the new camaro... it has smallish brakes over those giant 20's.

I wish the car had smaller wheel openings (and 19s as the largest rim option, not 20s) ... along with of course a lower belt line and larger windows.

I'm thrilled to hear it is a great driving car (I had a few f body cars back in my college days) but looks aren't on its side.
I just know the previous gens had issues finding 18" wheels that could clear the brembo calipers on the SS cars. There were some options out there, but not many.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2015, 12:00 PM   #66
Simple5
Major
346
Rep
1,391
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 M5
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA

iTrader: (8)

The Camaro finally trumps the Mustang. Read the review on this car and if I were to choose an average man's American Muscle it would be the Camaro hands down.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST