06-05-2017, 03:20 PM | #1 |
Private
67
Rep 68
Posts
Drives: '17 M2, '12 Golf
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bergen County, NJ
|
The good, bad and ugly when it comes to XPEL
Hi there, gang.
I am going to definitely yank off the 3M BS film that comes on the M2's rear fender. I know a lot of people are super pumped about XPEL but curious if that really is the best-in-breed material at the moment. Would love to hear about any experiences whether they were good, bad or just downright ugly. Thank you! |
06-05-2017, 04:48 PM | #2 |
Captain
472
Rep 682
Posts |
I just had my bumper done with xpel. From the research I did, it seemed to have the best reputation as long as your installer was on his game. Mine looks like, well....nothing, aka great.
__________________
2004 E46 ///M3 SMG Convertible Carbon Blk\Imola
2017 LBB ///M2 DCT 2013 Porsche Boxster S |
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2017, 05:36 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
218
Rep 435
Posts |
Completely agree, the product is only as good as the installer. I went onto Xpel's site and found a certified installer in my area and then confirmed their work via yelp. They cut the product with machine into 3 pieces and the install turned out to be near perfect, seams are only visible from within 3 feet
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2017, 05:37 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant
644
Rep 544
Posts |
A lot of installers have been switching to Suntek.
They all claim it's because the material is of higher quality thus more resistant to blemishing and yellowing, but I'm not sure how valid those claims are. My guess is Suntek went through a marketing push and offered some significant discounts to installers. Even if that's the case, that doesn't mean it's not a better or equal product. I have it on my car. How it looks post-install is really up to the installer. Find a reputable one. How it's going to look in 2-3 years? At this point, who knows? |
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2017, 09:13 PM | #5 |
Captain
548
Rep 642
Posts |
My local installer used the 3M pro series with a pre-pattern for the front bumper cover, headlamps, and running boards. Then did custom pieces for the area behind the rear wheels/qtr panel. I left the stock film on the front part of the rear qtr as the car is LBB and decided to see how it looked in time. Overall, super happy with the results, although I think that a full custom wrap, although more expensive, would show less seams and be better if installed properly. It would be best to find someone who has already done an M2 as I was told that it was a fairly involved process to get the frt cover just right. I have a couple very, very small areas that aren't perfect, but you need to be staring at them up close to notice. Thinking of doing the full hood as well now that I have seen the results.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2017, 01:40 AM | #6 |
Lieutenant
375
Rep 507
Posts |
Xpel has a grittier look to it so it is better for light color cars as it's not as noticable on them. If you have mineral grey or BSM go with suntek.
__________________
Present: 21 M2C 6MT/Ford something
Past: M2 Mineral Grey 6MT Past: BMW e30 m52 turbo 628whp/558wtq |
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2017, 02:25 AM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
370
Rep 354
Posts |
From personal experience, Suntek is bit better than 3M when it comes to quality of paint reflection, but it can't be compared with XPEL.
Also, the installation is not so easy with it. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2017, 02:56 AM | #8 |
Major General
5865
Rep 6,637
Posts |
From what I have heard Suntek is easier to install because it stretches easier, so installer may prefer for that reason. I also imagine it's easier to get it looking nice if it is easier to install.
Seems like some people can't tell the diff between Suntek and Xpel, but if they do they say Suntek looks a bit nicer. I guess Xpel Ultimate is thicker than the 5 year warranty Suntek. Not sure about Suntek Ultimate. For this reason perhaps Xpel offers better protection from stone chips. For the M2 I would make sure whoever you get uses an xpel pre cut pattern on the bumper because it should reduce the amount of cutting they do on the car if any and they won't be as at risk for stretching too much. Probably the best advice is to find an installer that a lot of people are happy with, then you will likely be happy. Brand is less important. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2017, 01:43 PM | #11 | |
Member
35
Rep 60
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Luyi_pr9.50 |
06-06-2017, 03:55 PM | #12 |
Private
27
Rep 57
Posts |
Very happy with Xpel. Installer only used pre cut pattern, no cutting on the car. I would suggest to remove the stock film on the rear quarter panel because it's too small and not of great quality.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2017, 05:10 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant
273
Rep 486
Posts |
It's not noticeable on my MG. No one has noticed it until I pointed it out (I wrapped the whole car but if you go with full front installs where they wrap edges on hoods you won't see it either). It does give an obvious orange peel effect so if you care about that, look elsewhere.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-07-2017, 02:41 PM | #14 |
Second Lieutenant
80
Rep 257
Posts |
Quality of the appearance has gone up. The Xpel patterns are really some of the best on the market if installed correctly with an eye for alignment.
Suntek makes a great film as well. Clear Guard Nano has some of the highest clarity for film on the market. It is more expensive to install. Find a great installer you trust and maintain the film. Thats how you get the life out of it. If you dont take care of it, it will not look good in the long run. Bruce |
Appreciate
0
|
06-07-2017, 03:17 PM | #15 | |
Private First Class
148
Rep 192
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-07-2017, 03:45 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant
273
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
That having been said, as with all films of the nature, you will probably have some even with the Suntek. Just the nature of the game. Even the best phone screen protectors that are wet install have some orange peel and aren't completely clear. It won't be as noticeable as XPEL up close. From a distance, you can't tell either one has it really. For me, it was more important to have the best protection (you can argue for either one, but I chose the XPEL because of the 10 year warranty. Worth more to me than the price difference from my installer) available than worry about orange peel. It's not a show car. If it was, then yeah, I would have done other things. Like not drive it to start. HA. |
|
Appreciate
1
zhp2m3147.50 |
06-07-2017, 04:30 PM | #17 | ||
Private First Class
148
Rep 192
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
1
blackholescion272.50 |
06-08-2017, 12:01 AM | #18 |
Private
47
Rep 70
Posts |
Very happy with mine so far. The installer i used recommended this exact thing a replaced the factory piece with xpel basically as a throw in for very little extra (i think $50 or $75 more) in addition to the full front.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-08-2017, 11:08 AM | #19 | |
Lieutenant
273
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
I recommend touching them up. You might as well have the car as close to perfect as you can before you do the PPF. |
|
Appreciate
1
zhp2m3147.50 |
06-26-2017, 08:43 PM | #20 | |
Captain
128
Rep 617
Posts |
Quote:
5 year is on the original PPF-C film. This film is the original and has been around for a long time. 10 year is on their newest film called Suntek "Ultra". Has a hydrophobic top coating and more resistant to yellowing and stains, etc. I am getting it done on the whole front of my car here in a couple of weeks. |
|
Appreciate
2
blackholescion272.50 D CHOI581.00 |
06-27-2017, 03:37 PM | #21 | |
Captain
581
Rep 844
Posts |
Quote:
Suntek would be my go to for PPF due to clarity but I would hope the "ultra" version would be at least the same or better. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2017, 05:33 PM | #22 |
Captain
128
Rep 617
Posts |
I've spent quite a significant amount of time researching and asking others who have the new film already. Most have said the clarity is the same, but the gloss has increased. I'll be sure to post up my feedback after my car is completed.
|
Appreciate
1
D CHOI581.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|