New Ytest
Sign out
Bimmerpost
Login
BMW E39 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
Go Back   BMW E39 5-Series Forum | 5Post.com > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-15-2022, 06:39 PM   #1
overcoil
Major General
3069
Rep
5,577
Posts

 
Drives: M235i 6spd
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Mid-Atlantic

iTrader: (0)

ConsuReport BMW #3

The November ‘22 car issue of consumer reports list in order Toyota, Lexus then BMW as top three most reliable car brands in this annual issue.

I hadn’t completely read the article but the new Tundra was an outlier with body finish & trim issues; one owner said his roof leaked. The Corolla Cross they had as the most reliable vehicle.

They had insufficient data for a lot of brands; Rivian, Dodge, Porsche …
Appreciate 4
      11-15-2022, 08:59 PM   #2
chassis
Colonel
chassis's Avatar
6374
Rep
2,283
Posts

 
Drives: 9Y0 Cayenne S
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Einbahnstraße

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Great job BMW. In fact BMW is the second most reliable manufacturer, because the first two brands are produced by the same manufacturer.

MB so bad...

https://www.consumerreports.org/car-...s-a7824554938/

RANK &
CHANGE
1 ↑2 Toyota
2 ↓1 Lexus
3 ↑10 BMW
4 ↓2 Mazda
5 Honda
6 ↑5 Audi
7 ↓1 Subaru
8 ↓1 Acura
9 ↑6 Kia
10 ↑14 Lincoln
11 ↓7 Buick
12 ↑9 Genesis
13 ↓4 Hyundai
14 ↑2 Volvo
15 ↓7 Nissan
16 ↑1 Ram
17 ↓5 Cadillac
18 ↓4 Ford
19 ↑4 Tesla
20 ↓10 Chevrolet
21 ↓3 GMC
22 ↓2 Volkswagen
23 ↓1 Jeep
24 ↓5 Mercedes-Benz
Appreciate 3
AlexFL7833.00
jmack548.50
      11-15-2022, 09:19 PM   #3
Sedoy
Captain
676
Rep
996
Posts

 
Drives: F10
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (0)

I think the B-series line engines have been a huge success for BMW. Both performance and reliability have been outstanding. As a bonus, the gas mileage is industry-leading as well. There is a reason people call it modern 2JZ...
Appreciate 4
chassis6373.50
Cos270608.50
heavyD^23684.00
      11-15-2022, 09:23 PM   #4
Burrcold
Brigadier General
5043
Rep
3,866
Posts

 
Drives: 2024 BMW M3 Comp xDrive
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Great upward movement for BMW and Audi...not so much for MB lol
__________________
Current: 2024 BMW M3 Competition xDrive | 2022 Audi Q7
Gone: 2022 Audi RS5 | 2020 BMW M340i | 2019 Audi RS5
Appreciate 2
chassis6373.50
AlexFL7833.00
      11-15-2022, 09:53 PM   #5
BMWCCA1
BMW Owner Since 1971
2236
Rep
1,393
Posts

 
Drives: 1964 700 Sport Cabriolet
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Virginia

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2013 BMW 128i  [10.00]
CR's problem has always been that their survey sample includes only their own members. It's pretty obvious they are not a fun-loving lot by looking at the makes they didn't have enough of to sample. Their auto ratings are like their toaster ratings. It's amazing to me that BMW is as high as it is, but that just convinces me that their methods and sample are skewed.
Appreciate 3
      11-15-2022, 10:06 PM   #6
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWCCA1 View Post
CR's problem has always been that their survey sample includes only their own members. It's pretty obvious they are not a fun-loving lot by looking at the makes they didn't have enough of to sample. Their auto ratings are like their toaster ratings. It's amazing to me that BMW is as high as it is, but that just convinces me that their methods and sample are skewed.
I can believe CR's results. It's talking about their new models whereas the older models (10 years or so) rated poorly, which I believe also. The fact that their members who own cars are rating them is good thing. There is no reason or incentive for them to lie on how reliable their cars have been and they know they have to be truthful because all the members rely on CR's ratings/recommendations for their purchase choices.

I'm a Japanese car guy and I happen to have had a BMW (E70 X5M) because I know and understand where it fell short reliability wise and the trade off with the M car performance is fair for me.

They have been spot on before with the fact that generally speaking Asian cars are overall reliable so and German cars are not so. If they are saying the NEW BMW's are very good reliability wise, unless proven otherwise, I'll believe it too.
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 3
      11-15-2022, 10:09 PM   #7
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by chassis View Post
Great job BMW. In fact BMW is the second most reliable manufacturer, because the first two brands are produced by the same manufacturer.

MB so bad...

https://www.consumerreports.org/car-...s-a7824554938/

RANK &
CHANGE
1 ↑2 Toyota
2 ↓1 Lexus
3 ↑10 BMW
4 ↓2 Mazda
5 Honda
6 ↑5 Audi
7 ↓1 Subaru
8 ↓1 Acura
9 ↑6 Kia
10 ↑14 Lincoln
11 ↓7 Buick
12 ↑9 Genesis
13 ↓4 Hyundai
14 ↑2 Volvo
15 ↓7 Nissan
16 ↑1 Ram
17 ↓5 Cadillac
18 ↓4 Ford
19 ↑4 Tesla
20 ↓10 Chevrolet
21 ↓3 GMC
22 ↓2 Volkswagen
23 ↓1 Jeep
24 ↓5 Mercedes-Benz
Yup. It's great to see that the new BMW's overall are now up there.
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 0
      11-15-2022, 10:51 PM   #8
BMWCCA1
BMW Owner Since 1971
2236
Rep
1,393
Posts

 
Drives: 1964 700 Sport Cabriolet
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Virginia

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2013 BMW 128i  [10.00]
I stopped believing in them even before they rated the BMW E28 "black dots" for the electrical system. Upon questioning, it turns out owners (with pocket protectors) were driving their cars through the carwash with the antenna mast deployed, which bent the mast and made the antenna no longer retract. That got listed as "Electrical problems" with CR. Note the evolution to the imbedded-in-glass antenna on the subsequent E34.

Even before that they rated the Porsche 914 as conditionally unacceptable because if you did something like their test with (let's say) 40psi in the RF tire, 22ps in the LF, 44psi in the LR, and maybe 20psi in the RR, the car handled "dangerously". Likewise they rated the BMW 2002 conditionally "unacceptable" because with a trunk full of luggage to the maximum GVW with 5 passengers on-board, they didn't like the rear clearance and included a photo showing the diff would barely clear a pack of Pall Malls sitting on edge under the car. At that point I stopped believing they even knew anything about toasters or dishwashers, too. At some point they got into rating Hi-Fi components and said they all sound the same.

I figured the poor ratings for BMW were always because their typical Honda Accord member who at some point "graduated" to a BMW like you guys wear your Rolexes (obviously for the jewelry aspect—not to tell time) and for the money they spent they expected bland, appliance-like, reliability and were passionate only when something went wrong.

Perhaps the new survey shows the average late-model 330i today is really just a good appliance?
Appreciate 0
      11-15-2022, 11:45 PM   #9
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWCCA1 View Post
I stopped believing in them even before they rated the BMW E28 "black dots" for the electrical system. Upon questioning, it turns out owners (with pocket protectors) were driving their cars through the carwash with the antenna mast deployed, which bent the mast and made the antenna no longer retract. That got listed as "Electrical problems" with CR. Note the evolution to the imbedded-in-glass antenna on the subsequent E34.

Even before that they rated the Porsche 914 as conditionally unacceptable because if you did something like their test with (let's say) 40psi in the RF tire, 22ps in the LF, 44psi in the LR, and maybe 20psi in the RR, the car handled "dangerously". Likewise they rated the BMW 2002 conditionally "unacceptable" because with a trunk full of luggage to the maximum GVW with 5 passengers on-board, they didn't like the rear clearance and included a photo showing the diff would barely clear a pack of Pall Malls sitting on edge under the car. At that point I stopped believing they even knew anything about toasters or dishwashers, too. At some point they got into rating Hi-Fi components and said they all sound the same.

I figured the poor ratings for BMW were always because their typical Honda Accord member who at some point "graduated" to a BMW like you guys wear your Rolexes (obviously for the jewelry aspect—not to tell time) and for the money they spent they expected bland, appliance-like, reliability and were passionate only when something went wrong.

Perhaps the new survey shows the average late-model 330i today is really just a good appliance?
How many owners with erroneous reviews did you actually investigate and have evidence to give credence to your claim that CR's reviews are overall inaccurate? LOL I totally believe that Honda overall is more reliable than the older BMW's. I know for a fact that my E70 X5M, as much as I loved it, was not as reliable as my Lexus or Nissan, on par with what a BMW service manager told me beforehand about them validated by simply perusing this very forum and problems owners have. Feelings don't count, actual data you can provide does. Provide it and I'll believe it when I see it.
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 0
      11-15-2022, 11:52 PM   #10
wtwo3
Major General
wtwo3's Avatar
17864
Rep
5,462
Posts

 
Drives: 23 X7 40i; 23 M3; 24 cooper s
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Another thing that skews CR results is the availability of data at an individual model level. MB is showing up last but if you drill deeper you'll see only the E class and GLE were rated. So theoretically the rest of mercedes' lineup could have bulletproof reliability, but because of the unavailability of data, only their worst 2 models are featured, skewing the results into last place.

I'm not saying MB is a reliable brand, I just refuse to believe they're at the bottom.

As for BMW, I'm assuming once CR starts featuring iDrive8 models, that'll knock their reliability rating down quite a bit.
__________________
2023 BMW X7 xDrive40i
2023 BMW M3 6MT
2024 Mini Cooper S Convertible

'20 BMW m340i... '20 BMW X5 40i... '16 Infiniti Q50 RS 400... '10 Lexus RX 350... '08 Lexus IS 350... '00 Nissan Maxima... '93 Nissan Maxima
Appreciate 1
RM72870.00
      11-16-2022, 12:04 AM   #11
chris719
Major General
7272
Rep
7,252
Posts

 
Drives: '08 M Roadster
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

Worthless interpretation of small-sample-size data. CR is not very good for many things. It'll drop 10 places next year, don't worry lol.
Appreciate 1
RM72870.00
      11-16-2022, 12:12 AM   #12
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris719 View Post
Worthless interpretation of small-sample-size data. CR is not very good for many things. It'll drop 10 places next year, don't worry lol.
How many actually was there for BMW and it's referring to NEW BMW models, not the older ones.
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14

Last edited by Autobacs; 11-16-2022 at 12:22 AM..
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 12:16 AM   #13
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by wtwo3 View Post
Another thing that skews CR results is the availability of data at an individual model level. MB is showing up last but if you drill deeper you'll see only the E class and GLE were rated. So theoretically the rest of mercedes' lineup could have bulletproof reliability, but because of the unavailability of data, only their worst 2 models are featured, skewing the results into last place.

I'm not saying MB is a reliable brand, I just refuse to believe they're at the bottom.

As for BMW, I'm assuming once CR starts featuring iDrive8 models, that'll knock their reliability rating down quite a bit.
Okay. Do you have a more reliable survey that will prove CR's ratings are grossly inaccurate. No survey is going to be perfect and you can have a case that is it inaccurate if their cutoff number to have enough data to have a rating is too low. If that is the case, do you know what their cutoff number is? MB may not be at the bottom but talking to an MB Mech, I know for sure they do get a LOT of business and why I opted for a BMW over an MB.
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 12:39 AM   #14
Miszka80
New Member
Poland
18
Rep
7
Posts

 
Drives: BMW M5C F90 LCI
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Warsaw

iTrader: (0)

is there any report that shows which BMW models/series are most reliable?
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 06:20 AM   #15
Burrcold
Brigadier General
5043
Rep
3,866
Posts

 
Drives: 2024 BMW M3 Comp xDrive
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miszka80 View Post
is there any report that shows which BMW models/series are most reliable?
Yes, Consumer Reports lol
__________________
Current: 2024 BMW M3 Competition xDrive | 2022 Audi Q7
Gone: 2022 Audi RS5 | 2020 BMW M340i | 2019 Audi RS5
Appreciate 1
AlexFL7833.00
      11-16-2022, 06:49 AM   #16
wtwo3
Major General
wtwo3's Avatar
17864
Rep
5,462
Posts

 
Drives: 23 X7 40i; 23 M3; 24 cooper s
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autobacs View Post
Okay. Do you have a more reliable survey that will prove CR's ratings are grossly inaccurate. No survey is going to be perfect and you can have a case that is it inaccurate if their cutoff number to have enough data to have a rating is too low. If that is the case, do you know what their cutoff number is? MB may not be at the bottom but talking to an MB Mech, I know for sure they do get a LOT of business and why I opted for a BMW over an MB.
I don't know what their cutoff number is and that's part of the problem. I wish they'd democratize some of the data - at least show us sample sizes for each model that has a rating.

And my comment is based on common statistical logic. Mercedes has a large lineup, but if you base your aggregate rating on only 2 cars out of their 15+ car lineup - that presents a big likelihood of skeweing of results.
__________________
2023 BMW X7 xDrive40i
2023 BMW M3 6MT
2024 Mini Cooper S Convertible

'20 BMW m340i... '20 BMW X5 40i... '16 Infiniti Q50 RS 400... '10 Lexus RX 350... '08 Lexus IS 350... '00 Nissan Maxima... '93 Nissan Maxima
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 06:53 AM   #17
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16942
Rep
18,578
Posts

 
Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWCCA1 View Post
I stopped believing in them even before they rated the BMW E28 "black dots" for the electrical system. Upon questioning, it turns out owners (with pocket protectors) were driving their cars through the carwash with the antenna mast deployed, which bent the mast and made the antenna no longer retract. That got listed as "Electrical problems" with CR. Note the evolution to the imbedded-in-glass antenna on the subsequent E34.

Even before that they rated the Porsche 914 as conditionally unacceptable because if you did something like their test with (let's say) 40psi in the RF tire, 22ps in the LF, 44psi in the LR, and maybe 20psi in the RR, the car handled "dangerously". Likewise they rated the BMW 2002 conditionally "unacceptable" because with a trunk full of luggage to the maximum GVW with 5 passengers on-board, they didn't like the rear clearance and included a photo showing the diff would barely clear a pack of Pall Malls sitting on edge under the car. At that point I stopped believing they even knew anything about toasters or dishwashers, too. At some point they got into rating Hi-Fi components and said they all sound the same.

I figured the poor ratings for BMW were always because their typical Honda Accord member who at some point "graduated" to a BMW like you guys wear your Rolexes (obviously for the jewelry aspect—not to tell time) and for the money they spent they expected bland, appliance-like, reliability and were passionate only when something went wrong.

Perhaps the new survey shows the average late-model 330i today is really just a good appliance?
I stopped reading CR car reports when they rated the 1984 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe as "poor" because it was difficult to get out of the driver's seat with two paper grocery bags of groceries...
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 1
chris7197271.50
      11-16-2022, 05:13 PM   #18
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miszka80 View Post
is there any report that shows which BMW models/series are most reliable?
Good question. I don't know of one. However, just peruse the different forums in here and you can get real world input.

For example: In the E70 X5M forums there are more issues (which i had) compared to the F85/F86 X6M forums, some of which I believe were because BMW corrected them with the general consensus that the later edition is more reliable. For example I had a 2013 CPO N63TU 650i which is notorious for its oil burning issue/BMW car care package. The current N63 models do not seem to have the same oil burning issue anymore.
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 05:18 PM   #19
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by wtwo3 View Post
I don't know what their cutoff number is and that's part of the problem. I wish they'd democratize some of the data - at least show us sample sizes for each model that has a rating.

And my comment is based on common statistical logic. Mercedes has a large lineup, but if you base your aggregate rating on only 2 cars out of their 15+ car lineup - that presents a big likelihood of skeweing of results.
Well the fact that they disclosed it was based on a limited sample because they actually had a minimum cutoff should already tell you it's not going to be conclusive so you cannot treat is as gospel. Obviously you can think that every BMW model is now very reliable because it clearly says it is overall BASED on models that met their minimum cutoff. To throw away the results because on an assumption made when the survey already discloses its limitation is really just throwing bricks at a glasshouse. Anybody in here going to dispute that a Lexus overall very reliable just because they feel CR's survey is worthless for whatever reason? I don't think so
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 06:04 PM   #20
wtwo3
Major General
wtwo3's Avatar
17864
Rep
5,462
Posts

 
Drives: 23 X7 40i; 23 M3; 24 cooper s
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autobacs View Post
Well the fact that they disclosed it was based on a limited sample because they actually had a minimum cutoff should already tell you it's not going to be conclusive so you cannot treat is as gospel. Obviously you can think that every BMW model is now very reliable because it clearly says it is overall BASED on models that met their minimum cutoff. To throw away the results because on an assumption made when the survey already discloses its limitation is really just throwing bricks at a glasshouse. Anybody in here going to dispute that a Lexus overall very reliable just because they feel CR's survey is worthless for whatever reason? I don't think so
I'm confused... why are you taking this so personally? do you work for CR?

I never said to throw away the results or that they were worthless. I was just pointing out a statistical weakness in their analysis that could potentially skew the results we see. To be discerning of the results rather than blindly following them, I thought, was the point of a discussion.

I'm actually a subscriber to CR, so I'm well aware of what they DO disclose vs. what they don't. And they've never fully disclosed their data (which to some extent I understand - data is $$). But as someone who works closely with data in day to day profession, I have to take what they show with a grain of salt, ESPECIALLY when something jumps 10 places from one year to the next.
__________________
2023 BMW X7 xDrive40i
2023 BMW M3 6MT
2024 Mini Cooper S Convertible

'20 BMW m340i... '20 BMW X5 40i... '16 Infiniti Q50 RS 400... '10 Lexus RX 350... '08 Lexus IS 350... '00 Nissan Maxima... '93 Nissan Maxima
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2022, 06:06 PM   #21
wtwo3
Major General
wtwo3's Avatar
17864
Rep
5,462
Posts

 
Drives: 23 X7 40i; 23 M3; 24 cooper s
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autobacs View Post
Good question. I don't know of one. However, just peruse the different forums in here and you can get real world input.

For example: In the E70 X5M forums there are more issues (which i had) compared to the F85/F86 X6M forums, some of which I believe were because BMW corrected them with the general consensus that the later edition is more reliable. For example I had a 2013 CPO N63TU 650i which is notorious for its oil burning issue/BMW car care package. The current N63 models do not seem to have the same oil burning issue anymore.
If we're talking about which models CR considered to develop their rankings, for BMW that can be found by simply clicking on the rating to expand it:

Name:  Capture.JPG
Views: 655
Size:  22.2 KB
__________________
2023 BMW X7 xDrive40i
2023 BMW M3 6MT
2024 Mini Cooper S Convertible

'20 BMW m340i... '20 BMW X5 40i... '16 Infiniti Q50 RS 400... '10 Lexus RX 350... '08 Lexus IS 350... '00 Nissan Maxima... '93 Nissan Maxima
Appreciate 1
      11-16-2022, 06:38 PM   #22
Autobacs
Captain
Autobacs's Avatar
United_States
1304
Rep
735
Posts

 
Drives: 2019 BMW X6M
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: WA state

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by wtwo3 View Post
I'm confused... why are you taking this so personally? do you work for CR?

I never said to throw away the results or that they were worthless. I was just pointing out a statistical weakness in their analysis that could potentially skew the results we see. To be discerning of the results rather than blindly following them, I thought, was the point of a discussion.

I'm actually a subscriber to CR, so I'm well aware of what they DO disclose vs. what they don't. And they've never fully disclosed their data (which to some extent I understand - data is $$). But as someone who works closely with data in day to day profession, I have to take what they show with a grain of salt, ESPECIALLY when something jumps 10 places from one year to the next.
Not at all personal and no I don't work for them. My diatribe, the parts about not throwing out the baby with the water, was directed at those saying because they listed this model as this then I don't believe anything they say in their survey
__________________
2019 BMW X6M
2013 Lexus RX450H
2010 Nissan GTR AMS Omega 14
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST