|
11-16-2008, 09:06 PM | #155 |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 226
Posts |
A very small part of the equation. The foreign car companies are paying competitive wages. The UAW is an additional cost per car but not much. It is the american cars that nobody wants, thats the problem. Enough with the gimmicks and retro cars. Name one innovative american car in the last ten years? Look what Ford did to Range Rover and Jag in the short time they owned them.They can't sell Fords never mind Jags and RRs. GM, Does anybody want a Buick or Oldsmobile when you can have a Toyota Honda or Audi for the same price or less?
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2008, 10:05 PM | #156 | |
Major
70
Rep 1,456
Posts Drives: 2008 E92 335i Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
|
Quote:
For the record, I used to drive an 1992 SC400 with a 4-speed auto. It got 20 mpg on the freeway. The new Z06 would easily top that even w/ 250 more hp. I would definitely take a Z06 over an M3 at 65 or even 70K. The only people I know who wouldn't are my... guess what... BMW fanboy "friends." This doesn't include my friend who drives an E36 M3 and my other friend who grew up w/ MB.
__________________
"Yeah; well, my interior is better."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-16-2008, 10:50 PM | #157 |
Colonel
153
Rep 2,368
Posts |
runflats hit a nail 1 month of ownership had to replace.., my door won't unlock, lock..recall, turn signal bulb always go out always getting errors, navi sucks. It's fun to drive.. But I wish it can be reliable like those damn Japs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 01:06 AM | #158 |
Just another jerk in a hat...
119
Rep 1,462
Posts |
Basically when presented with facts (including a MPG test conducted in the UK which proves that the Z06 can get to 30+ MPG if driven correctly) you disregard fact and go back to "opinion".
Great technique!
__________________
He brought me up also out of a horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and established my goings.
And he hath put a new song in my mouth. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 02:24 AM | #159 | |
Major General
153
Rep 5,123
Posts |
Quote:
here's the article though: http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/10...hon-in-the-uk/ 30.96 MPG was the final figure. kind of a waste because nobody would probably ever drive the car like that. personally, i don't put much value into those kind of numbers because they aren't really applicable to the real world. similar to how top gear got an m3 sedan to have better gas mileage than a prius around the track. but saying that an m3 gets better MPG than a prius would be a joke, even though it was factually true in that instance. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 07:46 AM | #160 | |
Major General
1775
Rep 6,668
Posts |
Quote:
The bottom line is it gets 15 mpg in the city, ~24 on the hwy... Show me one person whose driveway connects to the hwy... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 09:21 AM | #162 |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 226
Posts |
Navi works fine for me. Nail in the tire is BMW's fault? Turn signal thing I remember from my old 3 series. They changed the entire socket the bulb fits into. Problem solved. Your locking problem is that the comfort access? I have same problem. Your problems are not so bad.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 09:30 AM | #163 |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 226
Posts |
I don't think MPG should be an issue when buying a $75k sports car. If the Corvette will be your weekend fun car it's not an issue. If it will be your daily driver you have bigger issues to be cocerned about.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 10:01 AM | #164 |
Major General
1775
Rep 6,668
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 12:06 PM | #165 | |
Just another jerk in a hat...
119
Rep 1,462
Posts |
Quote:
Both are V8's except one produces a sh*t load more HP, and is more fuel efficient. Plain and simple the LS7 is a more powerful and efficient engine than the S65B40. You should research the facts before you make claims about Vettes having "horrible mpg".
__________________
He brought me up also out of a horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and established my goings.
And he hath put a new song in my mouth. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 12:28 PM | #166 | |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 226
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 12:35 PM | #167 | |
Banned
217
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 01:03 PM | #168 | |
Just another jerk in a hat...
119
Rep 1,462
Posts |
Quote:
Is that why you spent $60,000 on a car that gets walked by a $58,000 car all day long?
__________________
He brought me up also out of a horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and established my goings.
And he hath put a new song in my mouth. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 01:09 PM | #169 | |
Just another jerk in a hat...
119
Rep 1,462
Posts |
Quote:
The Gas Guzzler Tax is a Federal excise tax applied to the domestic sale of new vehicles that don't meet certain fuel economy standards. Vehicles that get at least 22.5 mpg (combined) don't have to pay the Gas Guzzler Tax. Hence the Z06 at 24MPG doesn't have the tax, but the E9x M3 does because it can only reach 20MPG peak (more like 13-14 in most driving). Some cars that have the gas guzzler tax: - Lamborghini Murcielago (ITL) - variants of the Mustang (U.S) - XLR (U.S) Notice two of the above examples are cars from the U.S. Here's a document you can read that details the models that fall under the Gas Guzzler Tax for 2008: http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/guzzler/420b07018.pdf
__________________
He brought me up also out of a horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and established my goings.
And he hath put a new song in my mouth. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 01:21 PM | #170 |
Bates '08 Interlagos Launch
126
Rep 1,230
Posts |
With my z06, I average about 19mpg with mixed driving. Very good!
But really, does anyone actually care about gas mileage with these cars?! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 01:33 PM | #171 | |
I am Gundam
193
Rep 1,211
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 01:49 PM | #172 |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 226
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 02:24 PM | #173 | |
Major General
1775
Rep 6,668
Posts |
Quote:
Z06 engine is 7.0L producing max power of 505 HP (M5 does it with 5.0L engine) The M3 engine is 4.0L producing max power of 414 HP So, 43% larger engine that produces 18% more power... I would not call it a "sh*t load more HP"... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 02:30 PM | #174 | |
Major
70
Rep 1,456
Posts Drives: 2008 E92 335i Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
|
Quote:
And what kind of math are you doing? The LS7 is 1.75 times as big as the M3's V8 and 1.4 times as big as the M5.
__________________
"Yeah; well, my interior is better."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 02:31 PM | #175 | |
Second Lieutenant
8
Rep 226
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2008, 02:32 PM | #176 | |
I am Gundam
193
Rep 1,211
Posts |
Quote:
Who cares if an engine is 10 liters? If the car has decent fuel economy and performs like nothing else, who cares? Sure it is impressive companies can get 230 HP out of a 2 liter 4 banger, but who seriously gives a shit and factors it into their buying decision? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|