|
10-05-2020, 11:42 AM | #111 | |
General
19061
Rep 19,665
Posts |
Quote:
Not to reprise my comment from the other thread a few months ago, but in simple terms, it would cost the same or more to go backwards in technological time to the 1960s to redevelop the Apollo space program rather than jump forward. The technologies, techniques, and machine tools used to build Apollo-era spacecraft no longer exist and the people who developed the technology are no longer alive, or are of an advanced age that their contributions would be detrimental to the effort. Modern space exploration needs technology to move forward and the mission is different than the 1960s era programs. The Space Program is well past Pluto already. Google the Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 programs to see their status. Voyager is the farthest man-made object from the sun and is in interstellar space. New Horizons flew by Pluto in 2015. Putting humans on other planets is slightly difficult... NASA explored the solar system using autonomous spacecraft and planetary rovers in advance of human landings just as they did with the moon. The spacecraft technology shifted away from manned flight to autonomous programs as a consequence. Last edited by Efthreeoh; 10-05-2020 at 12:12 PM.. |
|
10-05-2020, 11:55 AM | #112 | |
Colonel
5951
Rep 2,017
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
10-05-2020, 12:54 PM | #114 | |
Recovering Perfectionist
20540
Rep 1,005
Posts |
"...and return them safely to the Earth" was a requirement in Kennedy's moon speech.
In case you have never read it, Presidential speech-writer William Safire wrote a really moving speech to be given by President Nixon in the event that Armstrong/Aldrin were stuck on the moon: https://www.space.com/26604-apollo-1...on-speech.html Quote:
__________________
Currently BMW-less.
|
|
Appreciate
2
dreamingat30fps5950.50 Efthreeoh19060.50 |
11-27-2020, 03:39 AM | #115 |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts Drives: |
to Efthreeoh
First, hello! My name is Tom and I'm new here. But I was very interested in this thread. Therefore, I would like to join the discussions.
You express the idea that such a space program could be even more expensive. Let me disagree. Yes, the programs of the space race era were amazing for the time. And there is no doubt that all participants in past events have made a significant contribution to the development of space technologies. But in our time, communication between scientists and researchers from different countries and companies is much more developed. Also, the space companies themselves are now much larger. Access to information plus access to the exchange of experience could give us in the near future even more interesting and useful programs for exploring the depths of outer space. Would you agree that the minds of today's scientists are no worse than the minds of scientists of the past? Imagine what opportunities might open up with the open collaboration of many large and small space companies. For example, just for example, if SpaceX, Blue Origin, Nasa and a dozen other companies that are less powerful financially, but no less powerful intellectually, join forces |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|