|
02-07-2011, 12:33 PM | #971 |
Major General
1296
Rep 7,389
Posts |
We got a surprise snow on Saturday, but the birds were very active:
Juvenile red-tail hawk hunting in snow by dcstep, on Flickr
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 12:54 PM | #973 | |
Major General
1296
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Quote:
That's the 500mm lens on the 7D at ISO 400, aperture preferred at f/4, +2EV to allow for the snow and resulting in 1/640th second. Handheld by the way. I normally want a little higher shutter speed for hand holds, but the light put me at my limits. The 7D is much better at ISO 400 than 800, although I do use it a lot at 800. Dave
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 01:06 PM | #974 |
Free Thinker
19190
Rep 7,541
Posts |
Very cool capture.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 01:57 PM | #975 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
I printed a buddies pictures at 3200 ISO the other day in a 4x6 to prove to him that he doesn't need to worry too much about the quality that shows up on compter screens. He was really suprised at the sharpness of the image. however, i told him at that ISO, there is no point in printing any bigger then that though. an 8x10 will start to show the softness, and maybe a hot spot or two. I've noticed that the 800iso isn't as nice on the 7D as it is on my 5D, but it's still a lot better then most other cameras i've tryed. It gets a couple hot spots, but nothing that shows up on images i've printed at this point. that's the problem with computers, they show us things that might not really be there because we are blowing the image up so much hoping to see details. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 03:05 PM | #976 | |
Major General
1296
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Quote:
For most birds you need 1/1200 to 1/2000th second to totally stop the wings. Hummers need even more. The real worry at this "low" speed is that I'm hand holding a 500mm lens. To be safe, many use 1/2000th second for handheld at that focal length. I've worked hard over the last year and gotten quite good at hand holding, but I wouldn't recommend 1/640th second to anyone without a lot of experience hand holding a super-tele. I'm keenly aware of noise. The +2EV is critical in this situation because of the overcast and all the snow. The sensor tries to make white snow look grey, so you need to add EV to compensate. Underexposure really multiplies noise. If you look at this in it's Original size by following the link to Flickr, you'll see great feather, eye and snow detail. Still, when I have no choice, I pump the ISO up. In fact, I started the day at ISO 6400 before the sun came up. Still, the 7D start showing mosaic smear above ISO 800. Since I use the full-screen to see my images in slideshow mode on my computers and on my 47" HDTV, I can easily see it and don't like it. Anyway, I move the ISO down below 800 whenever conditions allow, which they barely did in this shot. I don't print a lot and when I do, it's usually a vanity 11x14" book; however, I am thinking about selling a few prints at local art fairs and plan to print them pretty big. People like details in their nature shots. As you might imagine, shooting at 8-fps I had several shots to chose from. My priorities for picking the "winner" that I'll post are pose first, eye contact next and sharpness third. I'll look at the eyes at 100% to 200% in a preview to pick from my finalists. I'm totally pleased with this shot, but I often end up chosing something with a little bit of noise or slight OOF because the action or pose are just too compelling. Your "how will it be used" strategy makes a lot of sense to me. I fold that into my descision process. For nature and scenics I put a bunch of emphasis on sharpness. With scenics, I'm almost totally in control of sharpness because my tripod will allow any exposure and almost any ISO that I chose. OTOH, nature doesn't always allow "ideal" settings, so I'm often picking from among imperfect compromises while keeping in mind, "how will it be used?" Dave
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 03:26 PM | #977 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
what auto focus are you shooting with? AI servo for the moving animal? or do you find it's too imprecise? I tryed that back in the summer with my 5D when shooting my girlfriend horse jumping, and i found that when focusing on the horses head, the servo would be too slow to keep up with movement and i'd have the horses ass in focus.
some of the shots made me feel a lot like a horses ass when this happened. I ended up pre focusing on the jumps and waiting for the horse and rider to get to the location i wanted, then snapped, this worked best in the end with the 5D's auto focus. I'm hoping my 7D will be better for that. but if not, i'll still get to take about 3 -4 shots before horse is back on the ground. so far i've been able to have a little fun with it while standing in the ring with my girlfriend jumping right beside me, but i won't be able to do that in the summer. Then it's back to the side lines figureing out if i can auto focus or prefocus to get the shot. At least i'll have proper lighting in the summer again |
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 03:31 PM | #978 |
Colonel
111
Rep 2,163
Posts Drives: 2020 BMW 330i xDrive Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States
|
__________________
Former BMW Client Advisor
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 03:53 PM | #979 | |
Major General
1296
Rep 7,389
Posts |
Quote:
I also own the 5D MkII and find the 7D way better for this kind of thing. Here I was using f/4 and was pretty close to the bird, so the AF had to be spot on. If I hadn't pre-focused I'd have been likely to miss the bird since it would have been several shots before the camera caught up. Also, since the bird was low, I need to make certain that I kept the AF points on the bird because the camera will focus on the background if you let the points get off the subject. For your horse type situation, I too would have prefocused on the jump, but I would have tried to shoot at f/11 or smaller to increase DOF. At wide open apertures it could be very trick, where you might get the horse's eye in focus, but not the rider. You have to be careful that the camera doesn't focus on the jump, so I'd experiment with single-point, expanded point and even 19-point. With the 7D you can even manually activate individual points, in case the middle of the frame is not what you need. I learned to work around the AF of my 5D2 and it works fine in most situations, BUT the 7D is faster and more flexible in these regards. I hope the MkIII is as good as the 7D in this regard and the fps speeds up to at least 5-fps.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 05:02 PM | #980 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
and if they get it up to 5 fps, i'll definitely be looking to sell my 5DII and maybe even the 7D but it is hard to argue with 8fps.... time will tell. I definitely have some more work to do as far as the jumping goes, i'm generally shooting around an F8, but i've since been shooting with higher ISO so i should be able to close up the aperature some more this year and improve my shots while maintaining the higher shutter speeds. I think the 7D will be a nice asset to have. I just have to get used to shooting with a crop body again.... it's been interesting trying to adjust to the 2 bodies while using a lens that i thought worked one way, but works so differently when combined with the crop. Very fun |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 07:26 PM | #981 |
Major General
1296
Rep 7,389
Posts |
My only issue with my 7D is that its high-ISO performance is a couple of stops worse than my 5D MkII. If you're not careful you'll get a really thick, painting like mosaic distortion, even with a lot of +EV.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2011, 10:06 PM | #982 |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
just goofing around on my 11" laptop and tryed to make a picture i took today out of bordom and make it look old using windows live photo gallery....
kind of ended up looking like a news paper clipping. Last edited by The1; 05-05-2011 at 10:56 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 07:34 PM | #983 |
Banned
222
Rep 2,991
Posts |
here's a couple pics i took last year when my wife and i went to D-Land.
the first one of "Stitch" was at the Disney Parade - clown pointed right at me. the second one was the fireworks they do every night. funny thing is that i strapped my 18-200 VR DX lens onto my D700 FX camera and hoped for the best (had my D700 for 2 weeks and didn't know that you're supposed to use FX lenses on it, doh) - not the best combination ever HAHAHA !!!! |
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 10:53 PM | #985 |
12 yr old Juvie
1127
Rep 881
Posts Drives: His Mom Crazy Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: El Lay
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 10:59 PM | #986 |
Major General
490
Rep 6,798
Posts |
cool pic!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 11:15 PM | #988 |
Free Thinker
19190
Rep 7,541
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 11:36 PM | #989 |
12 yr old Juvie
1127
Rep 881
Posts Drives: His Mom Crazy Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: El Lay
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 11:38 PM | #990 | |
Major General
76
Rep 5,114
Posts |
Quote:
as for a "lucky shot" some of the best shots are. that's why we have our cameras strapped on our necks. for that once in a life time opportunity that sneaks up. You never know when something is going to happen, and you proved it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|