F1 2021: Belgian GP - Spa-Francorchamps (Aug 29)

[MKSixer]

Originally Posted by GuidoK

Pretty brave (or stupid) to speak for someone who is dead....

I understand that quite a few things are beyond your understanding.

[GuidoK]

Originally Posted by MKSixer

I understand that quite a few things are beyond your understanding.

And apparently quite a few beyond yours if you don't understand the point I'm making....

Speaking for someone who is dead (and not being a relative or very close personal friend), as an argument, is a faux pas, unless you're quoting him. And you're not doing that.

[yco]

Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium

And what was/is BOT at Mercedes ?

BOT is been HAM's lapdog from day 1 at Mercedes !
If BOT will get a Red Bull contract , he remains a grandma . Because he is ..
Red Bull can buy BOT to speak and to share the hidden Merc warpspeed secrets !
Too bad . But that's how it works in F1 mate !

as i ve told Bottas was the second driver as well mate.. but there is big catch..

each season he had a chance to win a tittle.. but he couldnt match Lewis.. he got 9 wins and almost 20 pole positions.. he had the same machinery with Lewis.. when there is testing on first practice or the second one.. duty was split between Lewis and Bottas.. Bottas wasnt a test driver for Lewis..

if he goes to Red Bull.. he will guard Max when needed like he did for Lewis.. but he WONT have a chance to win a tittle at all.. cause he ll be test driver as well for Max instead of getting used to the new car from early days..

if Bottas can have a chance to have the same machinery, and if he can qualify in front of Max.. switching them wont even take 2 laps.. on track battles.. forget about it.. Merc' was letting them race.. he wont even have a chance to race even once with Max..

if Red Bull sacks Perez.. he ll be among career cracked drivers.. he is more than enough for the job and he is a smart racer..

and since you like conspiracy theories.. why dont you think Bottas can carry some information back to Merc'.. think about it mate..

[MKSixer]

Originally Posted by GuidoK

And apparently quite a few beyond yours if you don't understand the point I'm making....

Speaking for someone who is dead (and not being a relative or very close personal friend), as an argument, is a faux pas, unless you're quoting him. And you're not doing that.

I understand the point you are making. There is a clear pattern of behavior on record which reveals his thought patterns, methods of operating as well as what he would do in similar situations. If you believe the man who leveled the largest fine IN THE HISTORY OF ALL OF SPORTS wouldn't take a dim view of RBR bringing the sport into disrepute through their actions you probably don't know much about the history of F1.

[GuidoK]

That is a different thing. You are now speaking for his actions.
That you extrapolate a thought pattern and apply that on a matter of current debate, and a very specific one at that, that is the faux pas.
It cannot be verified, and the person in question cannot defend or clarify on that.
And as you are no relative but just some guy on some forum makes it the faux pas.

There are lots of other ways to defend your argument. Extrapolating an opinion from a person who is dead and who you haven't known closely in person is not the way to do it.

And wasn't that fine related to espionage, and mclaren-mercedes?
Hardly the topic now at hand....so why you're bringing that up as another argument....

[MKSixer]

Originally Posted by GuidoK

That is a different thing. You are now speaking for his actions.
That you extrapolate a thought pattern and apply that on a matter of current debate, that is the faux pas.
It cannot be verified, and the person in question cannot defend or clarify on that.
And as you are no relative but just some guy on some forum makes it the faux pas.

No...it's called behavioral modeling and analysis. A little organization you may have heard of created the model. That organization is called the FBI.

[GuidoK]

Originally Posted by MKSixer

No...it's called behavioral modeling and analysis. A little organization you may have heard of created the model. That organization is called the FBI.

Really? the FBI???

I'm talking about a faux pas and you're referring to the FBI?!?


You're really missing the point here........

[MKSixer]

Originally Posted by GuidoK

Really? the FBI???

I'm talking about a faux pas and you're referring to the FBI?!?


You're really missing the point here........

Do you realize that this action is engaged by you whenever someone makes a point you can't address? It's called deflection.

[///M Power-Belgium]

Originally Posted by yco

as i ve told Bottas was the second driver as well mate.. but there is big catch..

each season he had a chance to win a tittle.. but he couldnt match Lewis.. he got 9 wins and almost 20 pole positions.. he had the same machinery with Lewis.. when there is testing on first practice or the second one.. duty was split between Lewis and Bottas.. Bottas wasnt a test driver for Lewis..

if he goes to Red Bull.. he will guard Max when needed like he did for Lewis.. but he WONT have a chance to win a tittle at all.. cause he ll be test driver as well for Max instead of getting used to the new car from early days..

if Bottas can have a chance to have the same machinery, and if he can qualify in front of Max.. switching them wont even take 2 laps.. on track battles.. forget about it.. Merc' was letting them race.. he wont even have a chance to race even once with Max..

if Red Bull sacks Perez.. he ll be among career cracked drivers.. he is more than enough for the job and he is a smart racer..

and since you like conspiracy theories.. why dont you think Bottas can carry some information back to Merc'.. think about it mate..

Checo Perez has the same machinery at Red Bull !
In the beginning of this season Checo was performing not too bad with a copy&paste of MAX's setup . But the RB16-B was and still is really hard to drive with ,because Checo was having unpredictable oversteer in the high-speed corners !
And currently Checo is screwing it up with his own setup ..Because it didn't work .
All the rest is just BS !

[GuidoK]

You really want me to explain to you the difference between a faux pas and FBI science?

Because that's not called deflection but it's called plain stupid.

But please do speak for Mosley like you knew him...
Because we all knew him just as much, which means none of us here knew him.
Everything you think you know about Mosley is the same as everyone else thinks he knows about Mosley, namely what we read in the media.
So anything you think you know, we also know, which makes the point your trying to make moot anyway.
Because my "behavioral modeling and analysis" data developed by "the FBI" says otherwise....

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium

Checo Perez has the same machinery at Red Bull !
In the beginning of this season Checo was performing not too bad with a copy&paste of MAX's setup . But the RB16-B was and still is really hard to drive with ,because Checo was having unpredictable oversteer in the high-speed corners !
And currently Checo is screwing it up with his own setup ..Because it didn't work .
All the rest is just BS !

How many more times do you have to explain to them my friend OMW! I would be getting lock jaw if I kept repeating so many times. One day they will catch it hopefully

[yco]

Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium

Checo Perez has the same machinery at Red Bull !
In the beginning of this season Checo was performing not too bad with a copy&paste of MAX's setup . But the RB16-B was and still is really hard to drive with ,because Checo was having unpredictable oversteer in the high-speed corners !
And currently Checo is screwing it up with his own setup ..Because it didn't work .
All the rest is just BS !

mate just check this years practice sessions if Perez could spend the same like Max on race setup during weekends.. he is busy testing or using old parts.. i didnt tell anything about setup tweaks.. its a well-known fact.. thats how Red Bull choses to move on with their both drivers..

[///M Power-Belgium]

Originally Posted by yco

mate just check this years practice sessions if Perez could spend the same like Max on race setup during weekends.. he is busy testing or using old parts.. i didnt tell anything about setup tweaks.. its a well-known fact.. thats how Red Bull choses to move on with their both drivers..

Albon is doing all the Red Bull testing also during the winter stop . And he's doing a great job !

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium

Albon is doing all the Red Bull testing also during the winter stop . And he's doing a great job !

Another RB ex driver who was rammed by Ham to prevent him from winning knowing the rules would be lax in terms of punishment.

[Chappers 71]

^
The RedBullshit is strong in this one

[///M Power-Belgium]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

Another RB ex driver who was rammed by Ham to prevent him from winning knowing the rules would be lax in terms of punishment.

Of course my friend . As you know the FIA is part of Mercedes ...

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by Chappers 71

^
The RedBullshit is strong in this one

The Force is strong in RB. FTFY

[Chappers 71]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

The Force is strong in RBSR. FTFY

No...I believe you'll find I FTFY

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by Chappers 71

No...I believe you'll find I FTFY

That'll be the day

[Chappers 71]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

As if we would Max

Almost pissed myself laughing

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by Chappers 71

Almost pissed myself laughing

It's good you didn't

[Steeler]

Originally Posted by Chappers 71

^
The RedBullshit is strong in this one

About 2 weeks early on my self imposed hiatus, however this is apropos for your current adversary Chappers.
Mouth is open but no lights to be seen anywhere on that one