Sony T-200 Quality...

Design1314 · 12-20-2007, 03:40 PM

I recently purchased a sony T200 digital camera... it's 8.1mega pixel... but how come the picture quality does not look very clear and sharp? Any suggestions? thanks

12-20-2007, 03:42 PM

are all the settings on the highest?

BMWE90 · 12-20-2007, 03:55 PM

That's what I've noticed too. I compared Sony with Canon (7.2 MP) and the Canon's colors were deeper and the pictures looked better. My cousin said it might be the lcd display screen on the camera but I just dont think that's the case.

Design1314 · 12-20-2007, 04:10 PM

I've set the picture quality to highest, what else should be on highest? i agree the LCD display quality is crap! even after imported to the computer still crap... lol. I mean come on Sony... What is wrong here?

The_Blob · 12-20-2007, 04:17 PM

T-100 is better than T-200

Hawkeye · 12-20-2007, 04:27 PM

The mega pixels don't really matter unless you are printing or blowing it up. It is the graphical processor that is in the camera that does the colors and everything. There is a really good thread on it in one of my photography forums, I'll try and find it tonight. Cannon rocks!

Design1314 · 12-20-2007, 04:54 PM

I found that it might be the ISO problem indoor shots, dark places...

RenaultOne · 12-20-2007, 06:15 PM

Canon rocks!!!! Sorry Sony!! But yea the MP doesnt really matter unless youre printing or blowing a photo up.

12-20-2007, 03:40 PM	#1
Design1314 Major 191 Rep 1,265 Posts Drives: e92 Join Date: May 2007 Location: NYC iTrader: (0)	Sony T-200 Quality... I recently purchased a sony T200 digital camera... it's 8.1mega pixel... but how come the picture quality does not look very clear and sharp? Any suggestions? thanks
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

12-20-2007, 03:42 PM	#2
nico335 Guest 0 Rep n/a Posts Drives:	are all the settings on the highest?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-20-2007, 03:55 PM	#3
BMWE90 Major 91 Rep 1,153 Posts Drives: E90 335 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bay Area iTrader: (1)	That's what I've noticed too. I compared Sony with Canon (7.2 MP) and the Canon's colors were deeper and the pictures looked better. My cousin said it might be the lcd display screen on the camera but I just dont think that's the case.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-20-2007, 04:10 PM	#4
Design1314 Major 191 Rep 1,265 Posts Drives: e92 Join Date: May 2007 Location: NYC iTrader: (0)	I've set the picture quality to highest, what else should be on highest? i agree the LCD display quality is crap! even after imported to the computer still crap... lol. I mean come on Sony... What is wrong here?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-20-2007, 04:17 PM	#5
The_Blob Second Lieutenant 501 Rep 298 Posts Drives: 2008 E92 335i Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Canada iTrader: (0)	T-100 is better than T-200
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-20-2007, 04:27 PM	#6
Hawkeye Brigadier General 2065 Rep 4,365 Posts Drives: '07 Z4 Coupe, '21 X3, '16 GMC Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Iowa iTrader: (0) Garage List 2016 GMC Sierra SLT [10.00] 2008 Yamaha R6 [9.00]	The mega pixels don't really matter unless you are printing or blowing it up. It is the graphical processor that is in the camera that does the colors and everything. There is a really good thread on it in one of my photography forums, I'll try and find it tonight. Cannon rocks! __________________ 2007 Z4 3.0si Coupe • 6 MT • Black Saphire Metallic • PP • SP 2016 GMC Sierra SLT Z71 Premium Plus 4x4 2017 Harley StreetGlide • Denim Black • V&H Tune 2021 BMW x30i • Phytonic Blue Metallic • Fully loaded
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-20-2007, 04:54 PM	#7
Design1314 Major 191 Rep 1,265 Posts Drives: e92 Join Date: May 2007 Location: NYC iTrader: (0)	I found that it might be the ISO problem indoor shots, dark places...
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-20-2007, 06:15 PM	#8
RenaultOne First Lieutenant 19 Rep 302 Posts Drives: BMW E90 328i Jet Black Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: LA / University of California, Berkeley. iTrader: (0)	Canon rocks!!!! Sorry Sony!! But yea the MP doesnt really matter unless youre printing or blowing a photo up.
	Appreciate 0 Quote