|
|
View Poll Results: Do you believe in bailing out the companies in trouble? | |||
Bail out the poor corporate bastards! | 19 | 30.16% | |
No Bailout! Let those suckers go down in flames! | 44 | 69.84% | |
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-30-2008, 08:20 PM | #45 |
Brigadier General
547
Rep 4,760
Posts |
Bailout Could Deepen Crisis, CBO Chief Says
Asset Sales May Lead to Write-Downs, Insolvencies, Orszag Tells Congress By Frank Ahrens Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, September 25, 2008; D04 The director of the Congressional Budget Office said yesterday that the proposed Wall Street bailout could actually worsen the current financial crisis. During testimony before the House Budget Committee, Peter R. Orszag -- Congress's top bookkeeper -- said the bailout could expose the way companies are stowing toxic assets on their books, leading to greater problems. "Ironically, the intervention could even trigger additional failures of large institutions, because some institutions may be carrying troubled assets on their books at inflated values," Orszag said in his testimony. "Establishing clearer prices might reveal those institutions to be insolvent." In an interview later yesterday, Orszag explained using the following example: Suppose a company has Asset X, whose value is recorded on the books as $100. Because of the current economic decline, Asset X's real value has dropped to $50. If the company takes part in the government bailout and sells Asset X for $50, the company has to report a $50 loss on its books. On a scale of millions of dollars, such write-downs could ruin a company. Such companies "look solvent today only because it's kind of hidden," Orszag said. "They actually are insolvent" already, he said. In hearings on Capitol Hill so far this week, criticism of the bailout plan put forward by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has largely been restricted to the shape of the $700 billion proposal, how the money will be spent and what sort of oversight Treasury should have. But Orszag yesterday questioned the wisdom of the plan itself, testifying that "it therefore remains uncertain whether the program will be sufficient to restore trust." In yesterday's interview, Orszag said, "The key question is: What are we buying and what are we paying for it?" Orszag offered alternatives, such as equity injections into particularly troubled companies, but allowed that those could lead to further problems, as well. In the end, he said, Congress must pass some sort of relief, if only because Wall Street is expecting it. "If we did nothing, there is a significant risk of another collapse of confidence in the financial markets," he said. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2008, 05:53 PM | #46 | |
MacroRisk
111
Rep 2,522
Posts |
Quote:
And this needs to be about the economy - not about pushing one's own political party / ideaology: there's another forum here specifically for politics ... The politics across the spectrum gets in the way of pragmatic solutions.
__________________
Just thinking of something not so witty ///M3 E92 '09 Jerez Black | 6MT | Ext Fox Red | Tech | Prem | 19s |Heated Seats | iPod |Smartphone | Euro Deliv June 09 Sold: 540iT / 530i / 323i |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2008, 07:35 PM | #47 | |
Brigadier General
547
Rep 4,760
Posts |
Quote:
Really, I would like to see certain regulations put in place, but most importantly, stop the cycle. This is caused by a systemic problem. To fix it will require systemic changes. Some of the other threads in the politics forum deal with a few of those. A couple external sources for information are Representative Ron Paul's website (www.ronpaul.com), the Consitution Party website (www.constitutionparty.com), Chuck Baldwin's website (www.baldwin08.com) and many others. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-02-2008, 08:17 PM | #48 |
Steve Forte Rio
153
Rep 2,392
Posts |
Burn that bailout bill.
Its bullshit!! All it does is cover up the dirt that's really happening behind the scenes. And who the hell came up w/ $700B?? Is is like some magical number?? "Hmmm.. $600B ?.... $400B ? .... no wait, $650B.... nah.... I got it $700B!!! ... wait.. or .. $675B? ... nah, let's stick w/ $700B, I've got bills to pay." |
Appreciate
0
|
10-06-2008, 01:23 PM | #49 |
Major
86
Rep 1,263
Posts |
The bill was padded with bunch of special interest "bailout $$$" to get the polititian/sponsor brownie points with their constituents.
Market heading south again...after a weekend to digest the plan. No winners globally. Other markets halted...pretty bad beating.
__________________
Need someone to install angle eye bulbs December 2018
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2008, 04:58 AM | #50 |
New Member
9
Rep 26
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2008, 05:17 PM | #53 |
AC
95
Rep 2,387
Posts |
ur... Jim Cramer predicted 7,700 for the Dow. Watch out below!!!
__________________
Your Supreme Leader
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2008, 08:33 PM | #56 |
AC
95
Rep 2,387
Posts |
now what? bail out for all the G7 countries...
please, stop screwing around with the markets and let the system run its course. everything will be back to normal in 18 months (if the stupid governments don't tamper with the markets)...
__________________
Your Supreme Leader
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-11-2008, 01:13 PM | #57 |
MacroRisk
111
Rep 2,522
Posts |
-
Um no. The freakin' banks won't even lend to each other. The liquidity system is totally effed. If we don't get the short-term financing market pumping we are going to have a really deep recession. This is a systemic market failure that even market purists like Arthur Laffer - and I have been debating this directly w/ him - recognize the necessity for direct assistance to get the wheels moving & restore confidence. The issue then is: which tools in the policy bag do you use? That's the real debate. The TARP has not even kicked in yet, and in the terms of the TARP there's a bunch of flexibility re what the Treasury / Fed can do. The market still has downside risk until the credit markets unfreeze.
__________________
Just thinking of something not so witty ///M3 E92 '09 Jerez Black | 6MT | Ext Fox Red | Tech | Prem | 19s |Heated Seats | iPod |Smartphone | Euro Deliv June 09 Sold: 540iT / 530i / 323i Last edited by Voltigeur; 10-11-2008 at 03:18 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-13-2008, 06:33 PM | #58 | ||
MacroRisk
111
Rep 2,522
Posts |
Quote:
"[Treasury is rolling out] a wide-ranging effort to restore confidence to the battered banking system, following similar moves by European governments that sent global stock markets soaring. The initiatives will likely supersede many of the government's previous efforts. One central plank of these new efforts is a plan for the Treasury to take approximately $250 billion in equity stakes in potentially thousands of banks, according to people familiar with the matter, using funds approved by Congress through the $700 billion bailout bill." What I have been looking for to get a more direct impact than buying distressed assets (which takes months to work); and the taxpayers get stock in return for their funds at risk. More on this from ISI Quote:
__________________
Just thinking of something not so witty ///M3 E92 '09 Jerez Black | 6MT | Ext Fox Red | Tech | Prem | 19s |Heated Seats | iPod |Smartphone | Euro Deliv June 09 Sold: 540iT / 530i / 323i |
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|