Still want an EV? (NO POLITICS)

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Which proves what exactly?

That you are easily misled.

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

That you are easily misled.

Misled about what?

[3PedalJake]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Misled about what?

You were misled about climate science by your failure to be swayed by appeal to authority logical fallacies.

[pbonsalb]

Originally Posted by Dégoûté

That you are easily misled.

This is a common problem for small minded people.

[LogicalApex]

Wait. Didn’t the anti-EV people in this thread say gas would always be available in a storm? And that EVs would be a risk due to lack of power?

Except you can still charge EVs, but you can’t buy gas…

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by LogicalApex

Wait. Didn’t the anti-EV people in this thread say gas would always be available in a storm? And that EVs would be a risk due to lack of power?

Except you can still charge EVs, but you can’t buy gas…

Attachment 3571246

If tankers can't get through because of storms then yeah gas station supplies will dwindle, no s#it Sherlock.

[Dégoûté]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

If tankers can't get through because of storms then yeah gas station supplies will dwindle, no s#it Sherlock.

Put those goalposts back!

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by 3PedalJake

You were misled about climate science by your failure to be swayed by appeal to authority logical fallacies.

Must have been all those Geology, Astronomy, and Paleontology text books I read that spewed misinformation. Because, you know, I'm so... small minded.

[Efthreeoh]

Originally Posted by LogicalApex

Wait. Didn’t the anti-EV people in this thread say gas would always be available in a storm? And that EVs would be a risk due to lack of power?

Except you can still charge EVs, but you can’t buy gas…

Attachment 3571246

Just as ridiculous a statement.