Quote:
Originally Posted by Sassicaia
You're arrangement of wife staying home while man goes to work is frankly non existent today. Here is why.
1.) feminism has said that arrangement is sexist. It has shamed it.
2.) it's rare (non existent?) that in today's worship kardashian (do nothing but live like a princes lifestyle) that woman worship, to find someone willing to do the HARD work to stay home and take care of all things outside of the man's work. They act like hiring help is actually a contributor
In today's world when married to a rich man woman want to a.) stay home, not work and if there are kids hire help. b.) if there is the pressure of work or expectations to contribute they cry sexism c.) when it comes time to divorce they want to rewind time decades as if they live in the era where woman do actually contribute half and demand massive settlements.
The problem is that in today's political climate no politician would touch this topic at the risk of being called sexist.
|
Ugh
Feminism is for everyone. If you're threatened by the word or disagree, grow up.
1. No, feminism has not said that this arrangement is sexist or shamed it. What it has said is the expectation of only women staying at home is sexist and should be shamed. There's a huge difference between the two points. My wife stays at home and no one is shaming us.
For practical reasons, such as recovering from child birth, breast feeding, and the typical pay disparity (another fun feminist issue) between men and women, women tend to become the stay at home spouse. Outside of those practical reasons, either person in a marriage are capable of staying at home and raising kids.
2. What the actual fuck is wrong with you?
2. a. I would love to be able to hire people to handle all the harder chores around the house. This is a gender-neutral desire.