View Single Post
      07-19-2007, 06:35 AM   #15
Klinn
Private
4
Rep
80
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Jul 2007

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus Decimus View Post
Could the scale still be ever so slightly off?
Quite possible! :smile: I think the likely range of error is about the thickness of the wider red lines. Of course, I'm also assuming that the source images I had to work with were accurate to begin with.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus Decimus View Post
Visually I was expecting the length difference in the rear to be a lil more dramatic.
Me too. My guess is that because the 135 is taller as well as shorter (and has a higher beltline) the proportions appear more "stubby" to the eye than the overlay suggests.
Appreciate 0