View Single Post
      12-23-2014, 10:15 PM   #101
FC4
Brigadier General
2681
Rep
3,406
Posts

 
Drives: Yes
Join Date: May 2014
Location: US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raikkonen View Post
Car and Driver tested the S8 @ 3.6 seconds, and Motor Trend @ 3.5, so yes, I am guilty of "cherry picking" the two largest automotive publications in the country.

My point is that the Audi is considerably HEAVIER and has considerably LESS POWER than the new CTS, yet it will always accelerate faster, wet or dry, because it has AWD. Same circumstances as the S63..MUCH, MUCH heavier, less power, and runs 3.7's.

Will the new CTS "beat" 3.7??? More importantly, repeatedly??? Maybe under perfect circumstances in So Cal, but never with the consistency of an AWD car.
Again...how old are you? I don't know of any grown adults who magazine race like this or consider 0-60 to be any sort of meaningful measurement. Most have the intuition and common sense to know that it means nothing when you're talking about 500+ HP cars.