Quote:
Originally Posted by Frostynorth
It depends on resolution imo, 27 is too small for 4k, 32 is too big for 1440p.
4k is also a LOT of pixels to render. 1440p is ~54% more pixels than 1080p, huge difference in video card power.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roman
I sit 22" away from a 49" curved ultrawide which is exactly the same size and screen real estate as two 27" 16x9 displays. It's easy for me to imagine what a third 27" display would look like. And that makes me want 32" displays for triples.
Frosty brings up some valid points worth considering. In the end, I think your GPU and the distance you sit from your monitor should dictate which size for triples.
|
RTX 3090ti, 12th Gen i9, 32gb DDR5. I currently have everything set up at about 26", but I can adjust as needed.
4k monitors are just too expensive for anything 120hz or higher. I'm trying to keep monitors and triple mount under $1500 as thats what I got back from returning my Pimax. I've already spent too much on all of this lol.